Decoupling Token Roles in Autoregressive Pretraining
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autoregressive pretraining increasingly draws on heterogeneous data, making it important to understand how a model learns from an individual token. The next-token prediction objective naturally identifies a token's contribution with its own loss. However, each token is not only a prediction target but also context for what follows. Using controlled corruption, we decouple these two roles and find a reversal: making a noisy token easier to predict reduces its damage as a target but increases it as context. The same decoupling helps explain text generated by language models: generation selects each token by its fit to the prefix, while its role as context is never tested against an independently determined continuation, because that continuation is generated to fit it. At known corrupted positions, acting through the context can reduce damage that removing the token's own loss does not. Understanding and controlling what a model learns from a token therefore requires decoupling its roles.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
62 of 81 references.
References · 62
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,193
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2015Scheduled Sampling for Sequence Prediction with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 803
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
38 more
- 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 612
- 2015Sequence Level Training with Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 576
- 2023Textbooks Are All You Needcited by 569
- 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 548
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 496
- 2024Dolma: an Open Corpus of Three Trillion Tokens for Language Model Pretraining Researchcited by 483
- 2023Scaling Data-Constrained Language Modelscited by 403
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2024DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelscited by 398
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 335
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 326
- 2023How Language Model Hallucinations Can Snowballcited by 311
- 2023Pretraining Language Models with Human Preferencescited by 247
- 2022Prioritized Training on Points that are Learnable, Worth Learning, and Not Yet Learntcited by 236
- 2024RegMix: Data Mixture as Regression for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 177
- 2024Rephrasing the Web: A Recipe for Compute and Data-Efficient Language Modelingcited by 161
- 2024QuRating: Selecting High-Quality Data for Training Language Modelscited by 157
- 2024Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Datacited by 151
- 2022What Language Model Architecture and Pretraining Objective Work Best for Zero-Shot Generalization?cited by 150
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Lawscited by 144
- 2024Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Needcited by 133
- 2024A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling Lawscited by 130
- 2018Sharp Nearby, Fuzzy Far Away: How Neural Language Models Use Contextcited by 113
- 2024ContextCite: Attributing Model Generation to Contextcited by 98
- 2024Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Modelscited by 84
- 2015How (not) to Train your Generative Model: Scheduled Sampling, Likelihood, Adversary?cited by 78
- 2017Data Noising as Smoothing in Neural Network Language Modelscited by 78
- 2019Tagged Back-Translationcited by 77
- 2020Improved Natural Language Generation via Loss Truncationcited by 75
- 2024What is Wrong with Perplexity for Long-context Language Modeling?cited by 69
- 2024Physics of Language Models: Part 2.2, How to Learn From Mistakes on Grade-School Math Problemscited by 50
- 2023Quantifying Context Mixing in Transformerscited by 43
- 2024Instruction Tuning With Loss Over Instructionscited by 40
- 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
- 2019Exposure Bias versus Self-Recovery: Are Distortions Really Incremental for Autoregressive Text Generation?cited by 35
- 2024Instruction Fine-Tuning: Does Prompt Loss Matter?cited by 26
- 2024Understanding the Effect of Noise in LLM Training Data with Algorithmic Chains of Thoughtcited by 19
- 2024Fine-Tuning Large Language Models to Translate: Will a Touch of Noisy Data in Misaligned Languages Suffice?cited by 17
50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.