mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

T-SHIRT: Token-Selective Hierarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuning

arXiv 2506.01317 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning is essential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to effectively follow user instructions. To improve training efficiency and reduce data redundancy, recent works use LLM-based scoring functions, e.g., Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD), to select high-quality instruction-tuning data with scores above a threshold. While these data selection methods often lead to models that can match or even exceed the performance of models trained on the full datasets, we identify two key limitations: (i) they assess quality at the sample level, ignoring token-level informativeness; and (ii) they overlook the robustness of the scoring method, often selecting a sample due to superficial lexical features instead of its true quality. In this work, we propose Token-Selective HIeRarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuning (T-SHIRT), a novel data selection framework that introduces a new scoring method to include only informative tokens in quality evaluation and also promotes robust and reliable samples whose neighbors also show high quality with less local inconsistencies. We demonstrate that models instruction-tuned on a curated dataset (only 5% of the original size) using T-SHIRT can outperform those trained on the entire large-scale dataset by up to 5.48 points on average across eight benchmarks. Across various LLMs and training set scales, our method consistently surpasses existing state-of-the-art data selection techniques, while also remaining both cost-effective and highly efficient. For instance, by using GPT-2 for score computation, we are able to process a dataset of 52k samples in 40 minutes on a single GPU. Our code is available at https://github.com/Dynamite321/T-SHIRT.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

Builds on

43 of 52 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  5. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  7. 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
  8. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  9. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  10. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
  11. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  12. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
31 more
  1. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  2. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  3. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  4. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
  5. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  6. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  7. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
  8. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 686
  9. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
  10. 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
  11. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  12. 2024From Crowdsourced Data to High-Quality Benchmarks: Arena-Hard and BenchBuilder Pipelinecited by 500
  13. 2024Safety Alignment Should Be Made More Than Just a Few Tokens Deepcited by 472
  14. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
  15. 2024Magpie: Alignment Data Synthesis from Scratch by Prompting Aligned LLMs with Nothingcited by 346
  16. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
  17. 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 257
  18. 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 232
  19. 2018Semidefinite relaxations for certifying robustness to adversarial examplescited by 179
  20. 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 174
  21. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
  22. 2022ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Modelscited by 103
  23. 2023NEFTune: Noisy Embeddings Improve Instruction Finetuningcited by 100
  24. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
  25. 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 58
  26. 2023Robust Counterfactual Explanations for Neural Networks With Probabilistic Guaranteescited by 45
  27. 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
  28. 2024Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating Systemscited by 29
  29. 2024SHED: Shapley-Based Automated Dataset Refinement for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 19
  30. 2024Quantifying Prediction Consistency Under Fine-Tuning Multiplicity in Tabular LLMscited by 6
  31. 2023Characterizing Data Point Vulnerability via Average-Case Robustnesscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 8.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: