ssToken: Self-modulated and Semantic-aware Token Selection for LLM Fine-tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data quality plays a critical role in enhancing supervised fine-tuning (SFT) for large language models (LLMs), and token-level data selection has emerged as a promising direction for its fine-grained nature. Despite their strong empirical performance, existing token-level selection methods share two key limitations: (1) requiring training or accessing an additional reference model, and (2) relying solely on loss information for token selection, which cannot well preserve semantically important tokens that are not favored by loss-based metrics. To address these challenges, we propose ssToken, a Self-modulated and Semantic-aware Token Selection approach. ssToken leverages readily accessible history models to compute the per-token loss difference with the current model, which serves as a self-modulated signal that enables the model to adaptively select tokens along its optimization trajectory, rather than relying on excess loss from an offline-trained reference model as in prior works. We further introduce a semantic-aware, attention-based token importance estimation metric, orthogonal to loss-based selection and providing complementary semantic information for more effective filtering. Extensive experiments across different model families and scales demonstrate that both self-modulated selection and semantic-aware selection alone outperform full-data fine-tuning, while their integration--ssToken--achieves synergistic gains and further surpasses prior token-level selection methods, delivering performance improvements while maintaining training efficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2025.
Builds on
47 of 57 references.
References · 47
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,411
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
35 more
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 763
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 739
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 721
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 716
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2024An Image is Worth 1/2 Tokens After Layer 2: Plug-and-Play Inference Acceleration for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 642
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 488
- 2023DoReMi: Optimizing Data Mixtures Speeds Up Language Model Pretrainingcited by 399
- 2022Deduplicating Training Data Mitigates Privacy Risks in Language Modelscited by 314
- 2024On LLMs-Driven Synthetic Data Generation, Curation, and Evaluation: A Surveycited by 244
- 2024RegMix: Data Mixture as Regression for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 177
- 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
- 2024Rho-1: Not All Tokens Are What You Needcited by 133
- 2024Keyformer: KV Cache Reduction through Key Tokens Selection for Efficient Generative Inferencecited by 126
- 2024Fit and Prune: Fast and Training-free Visual Token Pruning for Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 126
- 2023Skill-it! A Data-Driven Skills Framework for Understanding and Training Language Modelscited by 121
- 2023Synthetic Data Generation with Large Language Models for Text Classification: Potential and Limitationscited by 100
- 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
- 2023Data Pruning via Moving-one-Sample-outcited by 67
- 2024Attention Heads of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 67
- 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
- 2025Reverse-Engineered Reasoning for Open-Ended Generationcited by 32
- 2024Improving Data Efficiency via Curating LLM-Driven Rating Systemscited by 29
- 2025Data Whisperer: Efficient Data Selection for Task-Specific LLM Fine-Tuning via Few-Shot In-Context Learningcited by 20
- 2025QuaDMix: Quality-Diversity Balanced Data Selection for Efficient LLM Pretrainingcited by 16
- 2023Instruction Tuning with Human Curriculumcited by 15
- 2024Diversify and Conquer: Diversity-Centric Data Selection with Iterative Refinementcited by 13
- 2025T-SHIRT: Token-Selective Hierarchical Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 13
- 2024Speculative Coreset Selection for Task-Specific Fine-tuningcited by 10
- 2025Craw4LLM: Efficient Web Crawling for LLM Pretrainingcited by 6
- 2025Attributes as Textual Genes: Leveraging LLMs as Genetic Algorithm Simulators for Conditional Synthetic Data Generationcited by 5
- 2025Memory-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Transformers via Token Selectioncited by 4
- 2024Bridging Linguistic Structure and Mechanistic Interpretability for Conceptual Interpretation in Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025How Instruction-Tuning Imparts Length Control: A Cross-Lingual Mechanistic Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.