Gradients Must Earn Their Influence: Unifying SFT with Generalized Entropic Objectives
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard negative log-likelihood (NLL) for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) applies uniform token-level weighting. This rigidity creates a two-fold failure mode: (i) overemphasizing low-probability targets can amplify gradients on noisy supervision and disrupt robust priors, and (ii) uniform weighting provides weak sharpening when the model is already confident. Existing methods fail to resolve the resulting plasticity--stability dilemma, often suppressing necessary learning signals alongside harmful ones. To address this issue, we unify token-level SFT objectives within a generalized deformed-log family and expose a universal gate × error gradient structure, where the gate controls how much the model trusts its current prediction. By employing the Cayley transform, we map the model's continuously evolving uncertainty onto a continuous focus trajectory, which enables seamless interpolation between scenarios involving uncertain novel concepts and those involving well-established knowledge. We then introduce Dynamic Entropy Fine-Tuning (DEFT), a parameter-free objective that modulates the trust gate using distribution concentration (R'enyi-2 entropy) as a practical proxy for the model's predictive state. Extensive experiments and analyses demonstrate that DEFT achieves a better balance between exploration and exploitation, leading to improved overall performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2026.
Builds on
18 of 24 references.
References · 18
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2021Documenting Large Webtext Corpora: A Case Study on the Colossal Clean Crawled Corpuscited by 481
- 2025REASONING GYM: Reasoning Environments for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 121
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 121
- 2025m1: Unleash the Potential of Test-Time Scaling for Medical Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 42
- 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
- 2025Step-wise Adaptive Integration of Supervised Fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning for Task-Specific LLMscited by 25
6 more
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuningcited by 20
- 2025Beyond Log Likelihood: Probability-Based Objectives for Supervised Fine-Tuning across the Model Capability Continuumcited by 16
- 2026ProFit: Leveraging High-Value Signals in SFT via Probability-Guided Token Selectioncited by 16
- 2026Entropy-Adaptive Fine-Tuning: Resolving Confident Conflicts to Mitigate Forgettingcited by 14
- 2025Mitigating Forgetting in LLM Fine-Tuning via Low-Perplexity Token Learningcited by 12
- 2025Forgetting: A New Mechanism Towards Better Large Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.