mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LM-mixup: Text Data Augmentation via Language Model based Mixup

arXiv 2510.20449 ↗First posted 23 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 3

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction tuning is crucial for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the quality of instruction-following data varies significantly. While high-quality data is paramount, it is often scarce; conversely, abundant low-quality data is frequently discarded, leading to substantial information loss. Existing data augmentation methods struggle to augment this low-quality data effectively, and the evaluation of such techniques remains poorly defined. To address this, we formally define the task of Instruction Distillation: distilling multiple low-quality and redundant inputs into high-quality and coherent instruction-output pairs. Specifically, we introduce a comprehensive data construction pipeline to create MIXTURE, a 144K-sample dataset pairing low-quality or semantically redundant imperfect instruction clusters with their high-quality distillations. We then introduce LM-Mixup, by first performing supervised fine-tuning on MIXTURE and then optimizing it with reinforcement learning. This process uses three complementary reward signals: quality, semantic alignment, and format compliance, via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We demonstrate that LM-Mixup effectively augments imperfect datasets: fine-tuning LLMs on its distilled data, which accounts for only about 3% of the entire dataset, not only surpasses full-dataset training but also competes with state-of-the-art high-quality data selection methods across multiple benchmarks. Our work establishes that low-quality data is a valuable resource when properly distilled and augmented with LM-Mixup, significantly enhancing the efficiency and performance of instruction-tuned LLMs.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 74 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.

Builds on

74 of 110 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning25 Dec
  2. 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr

Other references · 72

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  9. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  10. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  11. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  12. 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
38 more
  1. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  2. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  3. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  4. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
  5. 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
  6. 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
  7. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
  8. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  9. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
  10. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
  11. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
  12. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  13. 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 354
  14. 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 314
  15. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
  16. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  17. 2020MixText: Linguistically-Informed Interpolation of Hidden Space for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 186
  18. 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
  19. 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
  20. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
  21. 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
  22. 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
  23. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  24. 2017HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inferencecited by 79
  25. 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
  26. 2024LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancementcited by 69
  27. 2024Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 68
  28. 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
  29. 2020SeqMix: Augmenting Active Sequence Labeling via Sequence Mixupcited by 52
  30. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  31. 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approachescited by 43
  32. 2025Advancing Multimodal Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Cold Startcited by 41
  33. 2021SSMix: Saliency-Based Span Mixup for Text Classificationcited by 39
  34. 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
  35. 2025SafeEraser: Enhancing Safety in Multimodal Large Language Models through Multimodal Machine Unlearningcited by 31
  36. 2022A Survey of Mix-based Data Augmentation: Taxonomy, Methods, Applications, and Explainabilitycited by 30
  37. 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
  38. 2024Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Principled Synthetic Logic Corpuscited by 29

50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
  2. 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
  3. 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning
  4. 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
  5. 2024Disperse-Then-Merge: Pushing the Limits of Instruction Tuning via Alignment Tax Reduction
  6. 2024CommonIT: Commonality-Aware Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models via Data Partitions
  7. 2023Rethinking the Instruction Quality: LIFT is What You Need
  8. 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Models