LM-mixup: Text Data Augmentation via Language Model based Mixup
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
Instruction tuning is crucial for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the quality of instruction-following data varies significantly. While high-quality data is paramount, it is often scarce; conversely, abundant low-quality data is frequently discarded, leading to substantial information loss. Existing data augmentation methods struggle to augment this low-quality data effectively, and the evaluation of such techniques remains poorly defined. To address this, we formally define the task of Instruction Distillation: distilling multiple low-quality and redundant inputs into high-quality and coherent instruction-output pairs. Specifically, we introduce a comprehensive data construction pipeline to create MIXTURE, a 144K-sample dataset pairing low-quality or semantically redundant imperfect instruction clusters with their high-quality distillations. We then introduce LM-Mixup, by first performing supervised fine-tuning on MIXTURE and then optimizing it with reinforcement learning. This process uses three complementary reward signals: quality, semantic alignment, and format compliance, via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We demonstrate that LM-Mixup effectively augments imperfect datasets: fine-tuning LLMs on its distilled data, which accounts for only about 3% of the entire dataset, not only surpasses full-dataset training but also competes with state-of-the-art high-quality data selection methods across multiple benchmarks. Our work establishes that low-quality data is a valuable resource when properly distilled and augmented with LM-Mixup, significantly enhancing the efficiency and performance of instruction-tuned LLMs.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 74 of its 110 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Oct 2025.
Builds on
74 of 110 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuning25 Dec
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignment14 Apr
Other references · 72
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
38 more
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,767
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2023The Flan Collection: Designing Data and Methods for Effective Instruction Tuningcited by 734
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
- 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
- 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
- 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 451
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
- 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
- 2024Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 354
- 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 314
- 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2020MixText: Linguistically-Informed Interpolation of Hidden Space for Semi-Supervised Text Classificationcited by 186
- 2019Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysiscited by 173
- 2019Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Ratescited by 142
- 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 126
- 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
- 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
- 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
- 2017HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inferencecited by 79
- 2021To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labelscited by 70
- 2024LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancementcited by 69
- 2024Preserving Diversity in Supervised Fine-Tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 68
- 2021Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 65
- 2020SeqMix: Augmenting Active Sequence Labeling via Sequence Mixupcited by 52
- 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
- 2025Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approachescited by 43
- 2025Advancing Multimodal Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning with Cold Startcited by 41
- 2021SSMix: Saliency-Based Span Mixup for Text Classificationcited by 39
- 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
- 2025SafeEraser: Enhancing Safety in Multimodal Large Language Models through Multimodal Machine Unlearningcited by 31
- 2022A Survey of Mix-based Data Augmentation: Taxonomy, Methods, Applications, and Explainabilitycited by 30
- 2022To Aggregate or Not? Learning with Separate Noisy Labelscited by 29
- 2024Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Principled Synthetic Logic Corpuscited by 29
50 most cited of 72 All 72 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants
- 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models
- 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuning
- 2025Aligning Instruction Tuning with Pre-training
- 2024Disperse-Then-Merge: Pushing the Limits of Instruction Tuning via Alignment Tax Reduction
- 2024CommonIT: Commonality-Aware Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models via Data Partitions
- 2023Rethinking the Instruction Quality: LIFT is What You Need
- 2024Unleashing the Power of Data Tsunami: A Comprehensive Survey on Data Assessment and Selection for Instruction Tuning of Language Models