mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Multi-Indicator Weights for Data Selection: A Joint Task-Model Adaptation Framework with Efficient Proxies

arXiv 2605.09665 ↗First posted 10 May 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data selection is a key component of efficient instruction tuning for large language models, as recent work has shown that data quality often matters more than data quantity. Accordingly, prior studies have introduced various multi-dimensional heuristics to evaluate and filter instruction data. However, most existing methods rely on static task-agnostic and model-agnostic weighting schemes, which overlook the varying requirements of specific downstream tasks and the differing pre-existing capabilities of models. In this paper, we propose a framework for learning multi-indicator weights that jointly adapts data selection to both the downstream task and the specific model. Our method identifies optimal weight configurations without full-scale fine-tuning by utilizing in-context learning (ICL) signals on compact tiny-validation sets. These signals serve as efficient performance proxies that ensure high-fidelity evaluation at minimal computational cost. Experiments across multiple benchmarks and model families, including Mistral, Qwen, and Llama, show that the approach achieves performance comparable to or exceeding full-dataset tuning while using only 30% of the training samples on GSM8K. Furthermore, our analysis reveals a trade-off between semantic diversity and logical complexity in reasoning tasks, highlighting the necessity of joint task-model adaptation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.

Builds on

31 of 38 references.

References · 31

  1. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  2. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
  3. 2025DeepSeek-V3.2: Pushing the Frontier of Open Large Language Modelscited by 755
  4. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 514
  5. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 354
  6. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 301
  7. 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 295
  8. 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 195
  9. 2024The Impact of Reasoning Step Length on Large Language Modelscited by 152
  10. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 134
  11. 2023#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 108
  12. 2024Long Is More for Alignment: A Simple but Tough-to-Beat Baseline for Instruction Fine-Tuningcited by 85
19 more
  1. 2023Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examplescited by 84
  2. 2023Efficient Benchmarking of Language Modelscited by 71
  3. 2023Instruction Mining: Instruction Data Selection for Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 57
  4. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  5. 2023One-Shot Learning as Instruction Data Prospector for Large Language Modelscited by 43
  6. 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
  7. 2023How Predictable Are Large Language Model Capabilities? A Case Study on BIG-benchcited by 34
  8. 2023A Preliminary Study of the Intrinsic Relationship between Complexity and Alignmentcited by 33
  9. 2024Automated Data Curation for Robust Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 27
  10. 2024Deeper Insights Without Updates: The Power of In-Context Learning Over Fine-Tuningcited by 20
  11. 2024Is In-Context Learning Sufficient for Instruction Following in LLMs?cited by 19
  12. 2025Data Whisperer: Efficient Data Selection for Task-Specific LLM Fine-Tuning via Few-Shot In-Context Learningcited by 19
  13. 2024Data Advisor: Dynamic Data Curation for Safety Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 13
  14. 2024Chasing Random: Instruction Selection Strategies Fail to Generalizecited by 12
  15. 2025Aligning Large Language Models to Follow Instructions and Hallucinate Less via Effective Data Filteringcited by 12
  16. 2025Rethinking LLM Evaluation: Can We Evaluate LLMs with 200x Less Data?cited by 8
  17. 2025Middo: Model-Informed Dynamic Data Optimization for Enhanced LLM Fine-Tuning via Closed-Loop Learningcited by 7
  18. 2025LASER: Stratified Selective Sampling for Instruction Tuning with Dedicated Scoring Strategycited by 1
  19. 2025Holdout-Loss-Based Data Selection for LLM Finetuning via In-Context Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.