Rethinking Token Reweighting for SFT: Suppress, Reverse, and Extrapolate Learned Features
New in LLM reasoning; no direction yet. LLM reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) learns most aggressively from tokens that the model deems least likely. This helps acquire new behaviors, but also amplifies noisy or conflicting supervision and can overwrite useful pretrained knowledge. Through a unified policy-loss view, we revisit existing token-reweighting methods and show that they assign nonnegative coefficients to demonstrated tokens. Consequently, they can suppress or amplify supervised updates, but cannot reverse harmful features once learned. Moreover, larger training weights do not amount to feature extrapolation, since they change the optimization trajectory rather than scale a fixed SFT direction. We argue that reversal and extrapolation require a stable reference frame defined by a fixed SFT delta. Motivated by this, we propose SCALE (Selective Control of Adaptation via Local Entropy), an entropy-guided adaptation-strength-control method that freezes the pretrained model and the SFT delta and learns bounded token- and module-specific gates by minimizing predictive entropy alone. These gates suppress, reverse, or extrapolate frozen SFT features according to their alignment with entropy reduction. Across Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B, Qwen2.5-Math-7B, and Qwen3-4B-Base, SCALE achieves mathematical-reasoning averages of 37.84, 43.60, and 36.57, exceeding the strongest corresponding baselines while remaining competitive on general-retention benchmarks. It also attains the best average code-generation performance across HumanEval, HumanEval+, and MBPP for all three models. These results suggest that effective SFT correction can benefit from controlling how already learned residuals are used, rather than only modifying how they are learned.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
21 of 37 references.
References · 21
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
- 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 1,040
- 2025SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-trainingcited by 672
- 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 587
- 2023Magicoder: Empowering Code Generation with OSS-Instructcited by 256
- 2023AdaMerging: Adaptive Model Merging for Multi-Task Learningcited by 252
- 2025On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectificationcited by 127
9 more
- 2020Self-training Avoids Using Spurious Features Under Domain Shiftcited by 69
- 2025Token Cleaning: Fine-Grained Data Selection for LLM Supervised Fine-Tuningcited by 39
- 2025RL Fine-Tuning Heals OOD Forgetting in SFTcited by 31
- 2024Efficient and Effective Weight-Ensembling Mixture of Experts for Multi-Task Model Mergingcited by 23
- 2026ProFit: Leveraging High-Value Signals in SFT via Probability-Guided Token Selectioncited by 18
- 2026Entropy-Adaptive Fine-Tuning: Resolving Confident Conflicts to Mitigate Forgettingcited by 16
- 2025Forgetting: A New Mechanism Towards Better Large Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 4
- 2026Entropy-KL Divergence-based Token Masking: A Novel Approach for Selective Fine-tuning of Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026MoE2-LoRA: When MoE Models Meet MoE-style Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Which Tokens Should SFT Actually Learn? A Token-Trimming Perspective on Mathematical Reasoning
- 2026Probability-Entropy Calibration: An Elastic Indicator for Adaptive Fine-tuning
- 2026InfoSFT: Learn More and Forget Less with Information-Aware Token Weighting
- 2026Supervised Fine-Tuning Needs to Unlock the Potential of Token Priority
- 2025Enhancing Large Language Model Reasoning via Selective Critical Token Fine-Tuning
- 2025Mind the Gap: Data Rewriting for Stable Off-Policy Supervised Fine-Tuning
- 2026PriFT: Prior-Support Guided Supervised Fine-Tuning
- 2026What Should SFT Learn? Conditional Information Gain for Generalizable Post-Training