mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Security

arXiv 2406.05590 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2024cs.CR cs.AI cs.CYcited by 90

Not on the map. Why?

Cited by 55 in LLM agents and tool use, but placed by its own abstract, which didn’t fit.

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are being deployed across various domains today. However, their capacity to solve Capture the Flag (CTF) challenges in cybersecurity has not been thoroughly evaluated. To address this, we develop a novel method to assess LLMs in solving CTF challenges by creating a scalable, open-source benchmark database specifically designed for these applications. This database includes metadata for LLM testing and adaptive learning, compiling a diverse range of CTF challenges from popular competitions. Utilizing the advanced function calling capabilities of LLMs, we build a fully automated system with an enhanced workflow and support for external tool calls. Our benchmark dataset and automated framework allow us to evaluate the performance of five LLMs, encompassing both black-box and open-source models. This work lays the foundation for future research into improving the efficiency of LLMs in interactive cybersecurity tasks and automated task planning. By providing a specialized benchmark, our project offers an ideal platform for developing, testing, and refining LLM-based approaches to vulnerability detection and resolution. Evaluating LLMs on these challenges and comparing with human performance yields insights into their potential for AI-driven cybersecurity solutions to perform real-world threat management. We make our benchmark dataset open source to public https://github.com/NYU-LLM-CTF/NYU_CTF_Bench along with our playground automated framework https://github.com/NYU-LLM-CTF/llm_ctf_automation.

Key facts. Cited by 90 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2024.

Builds on

16 of 47 references.

References · 16

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  4. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  5. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  6. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  8. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 706
  9. 2021Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot's Code Contributionscited by 417
  10. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
  11. 2021Examining Zero-Shot Vulnerability Repair with Large Language Modelscited by 105
  12. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 94
4 more
  1. 2023Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPTcited by 53
  2. 2024An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challengescited by 33
  3. 2023Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questionscited by 23
  4. 2020Benefits and Pitfalls of Using Capture the Flag Games in University Coursescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 36; 2026: 47.

90 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilitiescited by 90
  2. 2025CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scalecited by 71
  3. 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Taskscited by 69
  4. 2025BaxBench: Can LLMs Generate Correct and Secure Backends?cited by 38
  5. 2025BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systemscited by 37
  6. 2024HackSynth: LLM Agent and Evaluation Framework for Autonomous Penetration Testingcited by 35
  7. 2025RealMath: A Continuous Benchmark for Evaluating Language Models on Research-Level Mathematicscited by 30
  8. 2026ExploitGym: Can AI Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks?cited by 24
  9. 2025Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscapecited by 21
  10. 2025D-CIPHER: Dynamic Collaborative Intelligent Multi-Agent System with Planner and Heterogeneous Executors for Offensive Securitycited by 19
  11. 2025HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Taskscited by 19
  12. 2025Is Vibe Coding Safe? Benchmarking Vulnerability of Agent-Generated Code in Real-World Taskscited by 18
38 more
  1. 2026Quantifying Frontier LLM Capabilities for Container Sandbox Escapecited by 18
  2. 2025Incalmo: An Autonomous LLM-assisted System for Red Teaming Multi-Host Networkscited by 17
  3. 2025A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AIcited by 15
  4. 2025Training Language Model Agents to Find Vulnerabilities with CTF-Dojocited by 15
  5. 2024Hacking CTFs with Plain Agentscited by 14
  6. 2025AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking autonomous exploitation of adversarial example defensescited by 14
  7. 2025CRAKEN: Cybersecurity LLM Agent with Knowledge-Based Executioncited by 14
  8. 2025Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testingcited by 14
  9. 2025Benchmarking Practices in LLM-driven Offensive Security: Testbeds, Metrics, and Experiment Designcited by 13
  10. 2026Measuring AI Agents' Progress on Multi-Step Cyber Attack Scenarioscited by 13
  11. 2024Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB): Robustly Evaluating LLM Agent Cyber Offense Capabilitiescited by 12
  12. 2025SecureVibeBench: Benchmarking Secure Vibe Coding of AI Agents via Reconstructing Vulnerability-Introducing Scenarioscited by 11
  13. 2025Cybersecurity AI Benchmark (CAIBench): A Meta-Benchmark for Evaluating Cybersecurity AI Agentscited by 11
  14. 2026Synthesizing Multi-Agent Harnesses for Vulnerability Discoverycited by 11
  15. 2025Towards Effective Offensive Security LLM Agents: Hyperparameter Tuning, LLM as a Judge, and a Lightweight CTF Benchmarkcited by 9
  16. 2026SEC-bench Pro: Can Language Models Solve Long-Horizon Software Security Tasks?cited by 8
  17. 2024AutoPT: How Far Are We from the End2End Automated Web Penetration Testing?cited by 7
  18. 2025Dynamic Risk Assessments for Offensive Cybersecurity Agentscited by 7
  19. 2025PentestJudge: Judging Agent Behavior Against Operational Requirementscited by 7
  20. 2025PoCo: Agentic Proof-of-Concept Exploit Generation for Smart Contractscited by 7
  21. 2024eyeballvul: a future-proof benchmark for vulnerability detection in the wildcited by 6
  22. 2025PACEbench: A Framework for Evaluating Practical AI Cyber-Exploitation Capabilitiescited by 6
  23. 2026CyberGym-E2E: Scalable Real-World Benchmark for AI Agents' End-to-End Cybersecurity Capabilitiescited by 6
  24. 2025VADER: A Human-Evaluated Benchmark for Vulnerability Assessment, Detection, Explanation, and Remediationcited by 5
  25. 2026Tencent WorkBuddy Bench: A Multi-Domain Coding-Agent Benchmark with Contamination-Resistant Task Constructioncited by 5
  26. 2024SeCodePLT: A Unified Platform for Evaluating the Security of Code GenAIcited by 4
  27. 2025Improving LLM Agents with Reinforcement Learning on Cryptographic CTF Challengescited by 4
  28. 2025From Trace to Line: LLM Agent for Real-World OSS Vulnerability Localizationcited by 4
  29. 2025LLM Agents for Automated Web Vulnerability Reproduction: Are We There Yet?cited by 4
  30. 2025Automated Penetration Testing with LLM Agents and Classical Planningcited by 4
  31. 2026AgentCyberRange: Benchmarking Frontier AI Systems in Realistic Cyber Rangescited by 4
  32. 2025Leveraging LLM Inconsistency to Boost Pass@k Performancecited by 3
  33. 2026CTFExplorer: Evaluating LLM Offensive Agents Through Multi-Target Web CTF Benchmarkingcited by 3
  34. 2026Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challengescited by 3
  35. 2026CTFusion: A CTF-based Benchmark for LLM Agent Evaluationcited by 3
  36. 2025Running in CIRCLE? A Simple Benchmark for LLM Code Interpreter Securitycited by 2
  37. 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 2
  38. 2025xOffense: An Autonomous Multi-Agent Framework for Penetration Testing with Domain-Adapted Large Language Modelscited by 2

50 most cited of 90 All 90 (JSON)

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AthenaBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence
  2. 2025Measuring and Augmenting Large Language Models for Solving Capture-the-Flag Challenges
  3. 2025Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Applications, Vulnerabilities, and Defense Techniques
  4. 2024SecBench: A Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking Dataset for LLMs in Cybersecurity
  5. 2025AttackSeqBench: Benchmarking the Capabilities of LLMs for Attack Sequences Understanding
  6. 2023Advancing TTP Analysis: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation
  7. 2026Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps
  8. 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledge