Leveraging LLM Inconsistency to Boost Pass@k Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive abilities in numerous domains, but exhibit inconsistent performance in response to minor input changes. Rather than view this as a drawback, in this paper we introduce a novel method for leveraging models' inconsistency to boost Pass@k performance. Specifically, we present a "Variator" agent that generates k variants of a given task and submits one candidate solution for each one. Our variant generation approach is applicable to a wide range of domains as it is task agnostic and compatible with free-form inputs. We demonstrate the efficacy of our agent theoretically using a probabilistic model of the inconsistency effect, and show empirically that it outperforms the baseline on the APPS dataset. Furthermore, we establish that inconsistency persists even in frontier reasoning models across coding and cybersecurity domains, suggesting our method is likely to remain relevant for future model generations.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2025.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 902
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 397
- 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 310
- 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 263
- 2022Demystifying Prompts in Language Models via Perplexity Estimationcited by 216
- 2019SPoC: Search-based Pseudocode to Codecited by 176
- 2024ProSA: Assessing and Understanding the Prompt Sensitivity of LLMscited by 149
- 2024When Benchmarks are Targets: Revealing the Sensitivity of Large Language Model Leaderboardscited by 137
- 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 93
7 more
- 2024Mind Your Format: Towards Consistent Evaluation of In-Context Learning Improvementscited by 83
- 2023Evaluating the Zero-shot Robustness of Instruction-tuned Language Modelscited by 66
- 2024POSIX: A Prompt Sensitivity Index For Large Language Modelscited by 59
- 2023The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful?cited by 44
- 2022Robustness of Learning from Task Instructionscited by 35
- 2025A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AIcited by 16
- 2024PertEval: Unveiling Real Knowledge Capacity of LLMs with Knowledge-Invariant Perturbationscited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?
- 2025LMR-BENCH: Evaluating LLM Agent's Ability on Reproducing Language Modeling Research
- 2025Slimming Down LLMs Without Losing Their Minds
- 2026Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents
- 2025ConsistencyChecker: Tree-based Evaluation of LLM Generalization Capabilities
- 2024LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning
- 2026EvalBuilder: Can LLMs Build Efficient Benchmarks?
- 2023Let's Sample Step by Step: Adaptive-Consistency for Efficient Reasoning and Coding with LLMs