mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CyberClear: A Benchmark for LLM Agent Systems on APT Attack Chain Provenance

arXiv 2609.32424 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language model agents have demonstrated promising capabilities in cybersecurity tasks, yet their ability to reconstruct complete Advanced Persistent Threat attack campaigns from complex security logs remains largely unexplored. Existing cybersecurity benchmarks for agents mainly focus on vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and security analysis tasks, leaving the evaluation of attack chain provenance under realistic security logs insufficiently studied. To address this gap, we introduce CyberClear, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents and advanced agent systems on APT attack chain provenance from long-context security logs. CyberClear covers both single-step attacks and multi-stage attack chains, requiring agents to identify attack evidence, infer attack progression, and generate provenance graphs containing entities, causal relationships, MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and forensic evidence. To enable comprehensive evaluation, we develop an evaluation method tailored to APT attack chain provenance. Unlike conventional text similarity metrics that focus on surface-level matching, our evaluation examines whether reconstructed graphs preserve the semantics of attack chains across single-step behavior correctness, multi-step behavior identification, temporal and causal consistency, entity and relationship fidelity, and overall attack narrative consistency. Advanced multi-agent systems powered by state-of-the-art LLMs still struggle on CyberClear, motivating us to propose CyberProvenance, an agent cyber harness designed for multi-agents that augments LLM agents with evidence accumulation, execution-based validation, and feedback-guided refinement mechanisms for reliable attack-chain provenance. Extensive evaluations on CyberClear demonstrate the effectiveness of CyberProvenance in improving evidence reasoning, execution-grounded validation, and complete APT attack chain reconstruction.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 46 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

46 of 71 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026DiagChain: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agents on Evidence-Grounded Attack Chain Reconstruction4 Aug
  2. 2025Cybersecurity AI Benchmark (CAIBench): A Meta-Benchmark for Evaluating Cybersecurity AI Agents28 Oct
  3. 2025LLM-driven Provenance Forensics for Threat Investigation and Detection29 Aug
  4. 2025SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks13 Jun
  5. 2025BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems21 May
  6. 2025CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities21 Mar
  7. 2024LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilities11 Apr

Other references · 39

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  3. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  4. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  5. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  6. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  7. 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 956
  8. 2026DeepSeek-V4: Towards Highly Efficient Million-Token Context Intelligencecited by 877
  9. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
  10. 2023LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusioncited by 550
  11. 2026GLM-5: from Vibe Coding to Agentic Engineeringcited by 502
  12. 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 468
27 more
  1. 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 281
  2. 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaborationcited by 246
  3. 2024Scaling Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 235
  4. 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 156
  5. 2018Kitsune: An Ensemble of Autoencoders for Online Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 121
  6. 2024AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platformcited by 120
  7. 2018TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and Timecited by 108
  8. 2023PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Toolcited by 94
  9. 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 90
  10. 2025CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scalecited by 71
  11. 2018HOLMES: Real-time APT Detection through Correlation of Suspicious Information Flowscited by 43
  12. 2023Kairos: Practical Intrusion Detection and Investigation using Whole-system Provenancecited by 30
  13. 2018SLEUTH: Real-time Attack Scenario Reconstruction from COTS Audit Datacited by 28
  14. 2025AgentScope 1.0: A Developer-Centric Framework for Building Agentic Applicationscited by 16
  15. 2023NODLINK: An Online System for Fine-Grained APT Attack Detection and Investigationcited by 14
  16. 2025AutoAdvExBench: Benchmarking autonomous exploitation of adversarial example defensescited by 14
  17. 2025Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testingcited by 14
  18. 2020Threat Detection and Investigation with System-level Provenance Graphs: A Surveycited by 8
  19. 2025OCR-APT: Reconstructing APT Stories from Audit Logs using Subgraph Anomaly Detection and LLMscited by 6
  20. 2025APT-LLM: Embedding-Based Anomaly Detection of Cyber Advanced Persistent Threats Using Large Language Modelscited by 4
  21. 2026Retrieval-Augmented LLMs for Security Incident Analysiscited by 4
  22. 2026Learning the APT Kill Chain: Temporal Reasoning over Provenance Data for Attack Stage Estimationcited by 3
  23. 2025MITRE ATT&CK Applications in Cybersecurity and The Way Forwardcited by 2
  24. 2025APT-CGLP: Advanced Persistent Threat Hunting via Contrastive Graph-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 1
  25. 2026CAM-LDS: Cyber Attack Manifestations for Automatic Interpretation of System Logs and Security Alertscited by 1
  26. 2026ProvAgent: Threat Detection Based on Identity-Behavior Binding and Multi-Agent Collaborative Attack Investigationcited by 1
  27. 2026HunterAgent: Neuro-Symbolic Attack Trace Reconstruction under Anti-Forensicscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Agent Traces to Trust: A Survey of Evidence Tracing and Execution Provenance in LLM Agents
  2. 2026MAP-Graph: Provenance-Aware Shared Memory for Multi-Agent Workflows
  3. 2026Beyond Predefined Sinks: Security-Aware Dependency Analysis for LLM Agents
  4. 2026Structurally Close, Temporally Distant: Measuring Security Exposure in Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  5. 2026Aligning Provenance with Authorization: A Dual-Graph Defense for LLM Agents
  6. 2025DefenderBench: A Toolkit for Evaluating Language Agents in Cybersecurity Environments
  7. 2026Context-Fractured Decomposition Attacks on Tool-Using LLM Agents: Exploiting Artifact Provenance Gaps
  8. 2026Minos: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Provenance-Based Backward Tracking