mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AttackSeqBench: Benchmarking the Capabilities of LLMs for Attack Sequences Understanding

arXiv 2503.03170 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) reports document observations of cyber threats, synthesizing evidence about adversaries' actions and intent into actionable knowledge that informs detection, response, and defense planning. However, the unstructured and verbose nature of CTI reports poses significant challenges for security practitioners to manually extract and analyze such sequences. Although large language models (LLMs) exhibit promise in cybersecurity tasks such as entity extraction and knowledge graph construction, their understanding and reasoning capabilities towards behavioral sequences remains underexplored. To address this, we introduce AttackSeqBench, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate LLMs' reasoning abilities across the tactical, technical, and procedural dimensions of adversarial behaviors, while satisfying Extensibility, Reasoning Scalability, and Domain-dpecific Epistemic Expandability. We further benchmark 7 LLMs, 5 LRMs and 4 post-training strategies across 3 benchmark settings and 3 benchmark tasks within our AttackSeqBench to identify their advantages and limitations in such specific domain. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of LLM-driven CTI report understanding and foster its application in cybersecurity operations. Our code of benchmark construction and evaluation and the corresponding dataset are available at: https://github.com/hulkima/AttackSeqBench.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2025.

Builds on

31 of 76 references.

References · 31

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  4. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  7. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  8. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  9. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  10. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  11. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
  12. 2024ChatGLM: A Family of Large Language Models from GLM-130B to GLM-4 All Toolscited by 1,121
19 more
  1. 2016FastText.zip: Compressing text classification modelscited by 335
  2. 2021AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Promptscited by 268
  3. 2024The Effect of Sampling Temperature on Problem Solving in Large Language Modelscited by 170
  4. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 96
  5. 2024O1 Replication Journey -- Part 2: Surpassing O1-preview through Simple Distillation, Big Progress or Bitter Lesson?cited by 92
  6. 2024Making Text Embedders Few-Shot Learnerscited by 79
  7. 2023Search-in-the-Chain: Interactively Enhancing Large Language Models with Search for Knowledge-intensive Taskscited by 73
  8. 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledgecited by 55
  9. 2024Reasoning in Token Economies: Budget-Aware Evaluation of LLM Reasoning Strategiescited by 45
  10. 2023SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Securitycited by 37
  11. 2021AttacKG: Constructing Technique Knowledge Graph from Cyber Threat Intelligence Reportscited by 31
  12. 2022Looking Beyond IoCs: Automatically Extracting Attack Patterns from External CTIcited by 27
  13. 2024Analyzing Temporal Complex Events with Large Language Models? A Benchmark towards Temporal, Long Context Understandingcited by 23
  14. 2025Primus: A Pioneering Collection of Open-Source Datasets for Cybersecurity LLM Trainingcited by 23
  15. 2024SecBench: A Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking Dataset for LLMs in Cybersecuritycited by 21
  16. 2024MCQG-SRefine: Multiple Choice Question Generation and Evaluation with Iterative Self-Critique, Correction, and Comparison Feedbackcited by 14
  17. 2023Context-aware Event Forecasting via Graph Disentanglementcited by 10
  18. 2024CoPrompter: User-Centric Evaluation of LLM Instruction Alignment for Improved Prompt Engineeringcited by 8
  19. 2024From Sands to Mansions: Towards Automated Cyberattack Emulation with Classical Planning and Large Language Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025AthenaBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligence
  2. 2025CTIConnect: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented LLMs over Heterogeneous Cyber Threat Intelligence
  3. 2025Uncovering Vulnerabilities of LLM-Assisted Cyber Threat Intelligence
  4. 2025DefenderBench: A Toolkit for Evaluating Language Agents in Cybersecurity Environments
  5. 2026Structured but Fragile: On the Limits of LLMs in Cybersecurity Decision-Making
  6. 2026Cyber Defense Benchmark: Agentic Threat Hunting Evaluation for LLMs in SecOps
  7. 2023LLMs Killed the Script Kiddie: How Agents Supported by Large Language Models Change the Landscape of Network Threat Testing
  8. 2024Crimson: Empowering Strategic Reasoning in Cybersecurity through Large Language Models