CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledge
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid evolution and use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in professional workflows require an evaluation of their domain-specific knowledge against industry standards. We introduceCyberCertBench, a new suite of Multiple Choice Question Answering (MCQA) benchmarks derived from industry recognized certifications. CyberCertBench evaluates LLM domain knowledgeagainst the professional standards of Information Technology cybersecurity and more specializedareas such as Operational Technology and related cybersecurity standards. Concurrently, we propose and validate a novel Proposer-Verifier framework, a methodology to generate interpretable,natural language explanations for model performance. Our evaluation shows that frontier modelsachieve human expert level in general networking and IT security knowledge. However, theiraccuracy declines in questions that require vendor-specific nuances or knowledge in formalstandards, like, e.g., IEC 62443. Analysis of model scaling trend and release date demonstratesremarkable gains in parameter efficiency, while recent larger models show diminishing returns.Code and evaluation scripts are available at: https://github.com/GKeppler/CyberCertBench.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2026.
Builds on
24 of 38 references.
References · 24
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
- 2022Grounded Copilot: How Programmers Interact with Code-Generating Modelscited by 218
- 2021On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generationcited by 176
- 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 164
- 2024Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilitiescited by 128
- 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 96
- 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 93
- 2024CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Modelscited by 89
- 2024CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 62
12 more
- 2024CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 58
- 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledgecited by 55
- 2022Describing Differences between Text Distributions with Natural Languagecited by 54
- 2023SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Securitycited by 37
- 2024An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challengescited by 35
- 2024Beyond Code Generation: An Observational Study of ChatGPT Usage in Software Engineering Practicecited by 25
- 2023Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questionscited by 23
- 2025A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AIcited by 16
- 2024Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB): Robustly Evaluating LLM Agent Cyber Offense Capabilitiescited by 12
- 2025OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilitiescited by 12
- 2024U-shaped and Inverted-U Scaling behind Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2021Cyber-Physical Energy Systems Security: Threat Modeling, Risk Assessment, Resources, Metrics, and Case Studiescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.