PACEbench: A Framework for Evaluating Practical AI Cyber-Exploitation Capabilities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The increasing autonomy of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitates a rigorous evaluation of their potential to aid in cyber offense. Existing benchmarks often lack real-world complexity and are thus unable to accurately assess LLMs' cybersecurity capabilities. To address this gap, we introduce PACEbench, a practical AI cyber-exploitation benchmark built on the principles of realistic vulnerability difficulty, environmental complexity, and cyber defenses. Specifically, PACEbench comprises four scenarios spanning single, blended, chained, and defense vulnerability exploitations. To handle these complex challenges, we propose PACEagent, a novel agent that emulates human penetration testers by supporting multi-phase reconnaissance, analysis, and exploitation. Extensive experiments with seven frontier LLMs demonstrate that current models struggle with complex cyber scenarios, and none can bypass defenses. These findings suggest that current models do not yet pose a generalized cyber offense threat. Nonetheless, our work provides a robust benchmark to guide the trustworthy development of future models.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2025.
Builds on
16 of 24 references.
References · 16
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 96
- 2025CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilitiescited by 96
- 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 93
- 2024RedCode: Risky Code Execution and Generation Benchmark for Code Agentscited by 90
- 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledgecited by 55
- 2024EnIGMA: Interactive Tools Substantially Assist LM Agents in Finding Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 52
- 2024PentestAgent: Incorporating LLM Agents to Automated Penetration Testingcited by 47
- 2025BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systemscited by 40
- 2024HackSynth: LLM Agent and Evaluation Framework for Autonomous Penetration Testingcited by 37
- 2025VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 31
4 more
- 2024AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testingcited by 21
- 2024SecBench: A Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional Benchmarking Dataset for LLMs in Cybersecuritycited by 21
- 2025Forewarned is Forearmed: A Survey on Large Language Model-based Agents in Autonomous Cyberattackscited by 16
- 2025RapidPen: Fully Automated IP-to-Shell Penetration Testing with LLM-based Agentscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 7.
7 papers.
- 2026Quantifying Frontier LLM Capabilities for Container Sandbox Escapecited by 18
- 2026Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testingcited by 4
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agentscited by 3
- 2026A New Framework for Cybersecurity Refusals in AI Agentscited by 1
- 2026RangeFactory: Scalable Construction of Multi-Hop Cyber Rangescited by 1
- 2026Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environmentscited by 1
- 2026From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-Worldcited by 0
- 2026Terminal Agents: A Survey of AI Agents in Command-Line Environments20 Aug 2026
- 2026RangeFactory: Scalable Construction of Multi-Hop Cyber Ranges10 Aug 2026
- 2026A New Framework for Cybersecurity Refusals in AI Agents31 May 2026
- 2026From Controlled to the Wild: Evaluation of Pentesting Agents for the Real-World11 May 2026
- 2026SIR-Bench: Evaluating Investigation Depth in Security Incident Response Agents13 Apr 2026
- 2026Hackers or Hallucinators? A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM-Based Automated Penetration Testing7 Apr 2026
- 2026Quantifying Frontier LLM Capabilities for Container Sandbox Escape1 Mar 2026