mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Incalmo: An Autonomous LLM-assisted System for Red Teaming Multi-Host Networks

arXiv 2501.16466 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 17

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security

Abstract (arXiv)

Security operators use red teams to simulate real attackers and proactively find defense gaps. In realistic enterprise settings, this involves executing multi-host network attacks spanning many "stepping stone" hosts. Unfortunately, red teams are expensive and entail significant expertise and effort. Given the promise of LLMs in CTF challenges, we first analyze if LLMs can autonomously execute multi-host red team exercises. We find that state-of-the-art LLM-assisted offense systems (e.g., PentestGPT, CyberSecEval3) with leading LLMs (e.g., Sonnet 4, Gemini 2.5 Pro) are unable to do so. Building on our observations in understanding the failure modes of state-of-the-art systems, we argue the need to improve the abstractions and interfaces for LLM-assisted red teaming. Based on this insight, we present the design and implementation of Incalmo, an LLM-assisted system for autonomously red teaming multi-host networks. Incalmo uses LLMs to plan red team exercises in terms of high-level declarative tasks that are executed by domain-specific task agents. Incalmo also uses auxiliary services to manage context and acquired assets. For our evaluation, we develop MHBench, a novel multi-host attack benchmark with 40 realistic emulated networks (from 22 to 50 hosts). We find that Incalmo successfully acquires critical assets (i.e., key hosts or data) in 37 out of 40 MHBench environments. In contrast, state-of-the-art LLM-assisted systems succeed in only 3 out of 40 environments. We show that Incalmo is efficient-successful attacks took 12-54 minutes and cost <15 in LLM credits.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 25 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2025.

Builds on

25 of 94 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  7. 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 635
  8. 2025Humanity's Last Examcited by 467
  9. 2023Chameleon: Plug-and-Play Compositional Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 352
  10. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
  11. 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 156
  12. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 94
13 more
  1. 2024Teams of LLM Agents can Exploit Zero-Day Vulnerabilitiescited by 93
  2. 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 90
  3. 2023Getting pwn'd by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Modelscited by 82
  4. 2024CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 56
  5. 2023Semantic Anomaly Detection with Large Language Modelscited by 53
  6. 2024An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challengescited by 33
  7. 2024PenHeal: A Two-Stage LLM Framework for Automated Pentesting and Optimal Remediationcited by 30
  8. 2025VulnBot: Autonomous Penetration Testing for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 30
  9. 2024Measure-Observe-Remeasure: An Interactive Paradigm for Differentially-Private Exploratory Analysiscited by 19
  10. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models' Capability to Launch Fully Automated Spear Phishing Campaigns: Validated on Human Subjectscited by 17
  11. 2024Catastrophic Cyber Capabilities Benchmark (3CB): Robustly Evaluating LLM Agent Cyber Offense Capabilitiescited by 12
  12. 2024SoK: On the Offensive Potential of AIcited by 5
  13. 2020HARMer: Cyber-attacks Automation and Evaluationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 14.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area: