mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI

arXiv 2503.11917 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As frontier AI models become more capable, evaluating their potential to enable cyberattacks is crucial for ensuring the safe development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Current cyber evaluation efforts are often ad-hoc, lacking systematic analysis of attack phases and guidance on targeted defenses. This work introduces a novel evaluation framework that addresses these limitations by: (1) examining the end-to-end attack chain, (2) identifying gaps in AI threat evaluation, and (3) helping defenders prioritize targeted mitigations and conduct AI-enabled adversary emulation for red teaming. Our approach adapts existing cyberattack chain frameworks for AI systems. We analyzed over 12,000 real-world instances of AI involvement in cyber incidents, catalogued by Google's Threat Intelligence Group, to curate seven representative attack chain archetypes. Through a bottleneck analysis on these archetypes, we pinpointed phases most susceptible to AI-driven disruption. We then identified and utilized externally developed cybersecurity model evaluations focused on these critical phases. We report on AI's potential to amplify offensive capabilities across specific attack stages, and offer recommendations for prioritizing defenses. We believe this represents the most comprehensive AI cyber risk evaluation framework published to date.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.

Builds on

25 of 52 references.

References · 25

  1. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  2. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
  3. 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
  4. 2023Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 130
  5. 2024Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilitiescited by 121
  6. 2023PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Toolcited by 94
  7. 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 94
  8. 2018SySeVR: A Framework for Using Deep Learning to Detect Software Vulnerabilitiescited by 91
  9. 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 90
  10. 2024CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Modelscited by 84
  11. 2024SpecRover: Code Intent Extraction via LLMscited by 71
  12. 2024Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAGcited by 67
13 more
  1. 2024CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 61
  2. 2023Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 58
  3. 2024CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 56
  4. 2024garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Modelscited by 48
  5. 2023SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Securitycited by 37
  6. 2024PenHeal: A Two-Stage LLM Framework for Automated Pentesting and Optimal Remediationcited by 30
  7. 2023Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questionscited by 23
  8. 2024Safety case template for frontier AI: A cyber inability argumentcited by 19
  9. 2025Incalmo: An Autonomous LLM-assisted System for Red Teaming Multi-Host Networkscited by 17
  10. 2024Exploring LLMs for Malware Detection: Review, Framework Design, and Countermeasure Approachescited by 13
  11. 2025OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilitiescited by 12
  12. 2024Employing LLMs for Incident Response Planning and Reviewcited by 8
  13. 2024HonestCyberEval: An AI Cyber Risk Benchmark for Automated Software Exploitationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 6.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: