A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As frontier AI models become more capable, evaluating their potential to enable cyberattacks is crucial for ensuring the safe development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Current cyber evaluation efforts are often ad-hoc, lacking systematic analysis of attack phases and guidance on targeted defenses. This work introduces a novel evaluation framework that addresses these limitations by: (1) examining the end-to-end attack chain, (2) identifying gaps in AI threat evaluation, and (3) helping defenders prioritize targeted mitigations and conduct AI-enabled adversary emulation for red teaming. Our approach adapts existing cyberattack chain frameworks for AI systems. We analyzed over 12,000 real-world instances of AI involvement in cyber incidents, catalogued by Google's Threat Intelligence Group, to curate seven representative attack chain archetypes. Through a bottleneck analysis on these archetypes, we pinpointed phases most susceptible to AI-driven disruption. We then identified and utilized externally developed cybersecurity model evaluations focused on these critical phases. We report on AI's potential to amplify offensive capabilities across specific attack stages, and offer recommendations for prioritizing defenses. We believe this represents the most comprehensive AI cyber risk evaluation framework published to date.
Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2025.
Builds on
25 of 52 references.
References · 25
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
- 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
- 2023Model evaluation for extreme riskscited by 167
- 2023Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 130
- 2024Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilitiescited by 121
- 2023PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Toolcited by 94
- 2024AutoAttacker: A Large Language Model Guided System to Implement Automatic Cyber-attackscited by 94
- 2018SySeVR: A Framework for Using Deep Learning to Detect Software Vulnerabilitiescited by 91
- 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 90
- 2024CyberSecEval 2: A Wide-Ranging Cybersecurity Evaluation Suite for Large Language Modelscited by 84
- 2024SpecRover: Code Intent Extraction via LLMscited by 71
- 2024Vul-RAG: Enhancing LLM-based Vulnerability Detection via Knowledge-level RAGcited by 67
13 more
- 2024CTIBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Cyber Threat Intelligencecited by 61
- 2023Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilitiescited by 58
- 2024CYBERSECEVAL 3: Advancing the Evaluation of Cybersecurity Risks and Capabilities in Large Language Modelscited by 56
- 2024garak: A Framework for Security Probing Large Language Modelscited by 48
- 2023SecQA: A Concise Question-Answering Dataset for Evaluating Large Language Models in Computer Securitycited by 37
- 2024PenHeal: A Two-Stage LLM Framework for Automated Pentesting and Optimal Remediationcited by 30
- 2023Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questionscited by 23
- 2024Safety case template for frontier AI: A cyber inability argumentcited by 19
- 2025Incalmo: An Autonomous LLM-assisted System for Red Teaming Multi-Host Networkscited by 17
- 2024Exploring LLMs for Malware Detection: Review, Framework Design, and Countermeasure Approachescited by 13
- 2025OCCULT: Evaluating Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Operation Capabilitiescited by 12
- 2024Employing LLMs for Incident Response Planning and Reviewcited by 8
- 2024HonestCyberEval: An AI Cyber Risk Benchmark for Automated Software Exploitationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 9; 2026: 6.
15 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 222
- 2025Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testingcited by 14
- 2026Measuring AI Agents' Progress on Multi-Step Cyber Attack Scenarioscited by 13
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucinationcited by 10
- 2025Dynamic Risk Assessments for Offensive Cybersecurity Agentscited by 7
- 2025Leveraging LLM Inconsistency to Boost Pass@k Performancecited by 3
- 2025Mitigating Cyber Risk in the Age of Open-Weight LLMs: Policy Gaps and Technical Realitiescited by 3
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 2
- 2025From Firewalls to Frontiers: AI Red-Teaming is a Domain-Specific Evolution of Cyber Red-Teamingcited by 2
- 2025HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application Vulnerabilitiescited by 2
- 2026AI Agents Enable Adaptive Computer Wormscited by 2
- 2026Hallucination-Resistant Security Planning with a Large Language Modelcited by 1
3 more
- 2026A Content-Based Framework for Cybersecurity Refusal Decisions in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026CritBench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities of Large Language Models in IEC 61850 Digital Substation Environmentscited by 1
- 2026CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledgecited by 1
- 2026AI Agents Enable Adaptive Computer Worms2 Jun 2026
- 2026CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledge22 Apr 2026
- 2026CritBench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities of Large Language Models in IEC 61850 Digital Substation Environments7 Apr 2026
- 2026Measuring AI Agents' Progress on Multi-Step Cyber Attack Scenarios11 Mar 2026
- 2026A Content-Based Framework for Cybersecurity Refusal Decisions in Large Language Models17 Feb 2026
- 2026Hallucination-Resistant Security Planning with a Large Language Model5 Feb 2026
- 2025Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testing10 Dec 2025
- 2025HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application Vulnerabilities14 Oct 2025
- 2025From Firewalls to Frontiers: AI Red-Teaming is a Domain-Specific Evolution of Cyber Red-Teaming14 Sep 2025
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities8 Sep 2025
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucination7 Aug 2025
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safety15 Jul 2025
3 more
- 2026Measuring AI Agents' Progress on Multi-Step Cyber Attack Scenarioscited by 13
- 2025Dynamic Risk Assessments for Offensive Cybersecurity Agentscited by 7
- 2025HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application Vulnerabilitiescited by 2
- 2026AI Agents Enable Adaptive Computer Wormscited by 2
- 2026A Content-Based Framework for Cybersecurity Refusal Decisions in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026AI Agents Enable Adaptive Computer Worms2 Jun 2026
- 2026Measuring AI Agents' Progress on Multi-Step Cyber Attack Scenarios11 Mar 2026
- 2026A Content-Based Framework for Cybersecurity Refusal Decisions in Large Language Models17 Feb 2026
- 2025HackWorld: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Exploiting Web Application Vulnerabilities14 Oct 2025
- 2025Dynamic Risk Assessments for Offensive Cybersecurity Agents23 May 2025
- 2025Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testingcited by 14
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucinationcited by 10
- 2025Leveraging LLM Inconsistency to Boost Pass@k Performancecited by 3
- 2025Mitigating Cyber Risk in the Age of Open-Weight LLMs: Policy Gaps and Technical Realitiescited by 3
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunitiescited by 2
- 2025From Firewalls to Frontiers: AI Red-Teaming is a Domain-Specific Evolution of Cyber Red-Teamingcited by 2
- 2026Hallucination-Resistant Security Planning with a Large Language Modelcited by 1
- 2026CritBench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities of Large Language Models in IEC 61850 Digital Substation Environmentscited by 1
- 2026CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledgecited by 1
- 2026CyberCertBench: Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Certification Knowledge22 Apr 2026
- 2026CritBench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities of Large Language Models in IEC 61850 Digital Substation Environments7 Apr 2026
- 2026Hallucination-Resistant Security Planning with a Large Language Model5 Feb 2026
- 2025Comparing AI Agents to Cybersecurity Professionals in Real-World Penetration Testing10 Dec 2025
- 2025From Firewalls to Frontiers: AI Red-Teaming is a Domain-Specific Evolution of Cyber Red-Teaming14 Sep 2025
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity: State of the Art, Challenges, and Opportunities8 Sep 2025
- 2025Incident Response Planning Using a Lightweight Large Language Model with Reduced Hallucination7 Aug 2025
- 2025Mitigating Cyber Risk in the Age of Open-Weight LLMs: Policy Gaps and Technical Realities21 May 2025
- 2025Leveraging LLM Inconsistency to Boost Pass@k Performance19 May 2025