mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

D-CIPHER: Dynamic Collaborative Intelligent Multi-Agent System with Planner and Heterogeneous Executors for Offensive Security

arXiv 2502.10931 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2025cs.AI cs.CRcited by 20

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been used in cybersecurity such as autonomous security analysis or penetration testing. Capture the Flag (CTF) challenges serve as benchmarks to assess automated task-planning abilities of LLM agents for cybersecurity. Early attempts to apply LLMs for solving CTF challenges used single-agent systems, where feedback was restricted to a single reasoning-action loop. This approach was inadequate for complex CTF tasks. Inspired by real-world CTF competitions, where teams of experts collaborate, we introduce the D-CIPHER LLM multi-agent framework for collaborative CTF solving. D-CIPHER integrates agents with distinct roles with dynamic feedback loops to enhance reasoning on complex tasks. It introduces the Planner-Executor agent system, consisting of a Planner agent for overall problem-solving along with multiple heterogeneous Executor agents for individual tasks, facilitating efficient allocation of responsibilities among the agents. Additionally, D-CIPHER incorporates an Auto-prompter agent to improve problem-solving by auto-generating a highly relevant initial prompt. We evaluate D-CIPHER on multiple CTF benchmarks and LLM models via comprehensive studies to highlight the impact of our enhancements. Additionally, we manually map the CTFs in NYU CTF Bench to MITRE ATT&CK techniques that apply for a comprehensive evaluation of D-CIPHER's offensive security capability. D-CIPHER achieves state-of-the-art performance on three benchmarks: 22.0% on NYU CTF Bench, 22.5% on Cybench, and 44.0% on HackTheBox, which is 2.5% to 8.5% better than previous work. D-CIPHER solves 65% more ATT&CK techniques compared to previous work, demonstrating stronger offensive capability.

Key facts. Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 29 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2025.

Builds on

29 of 52 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Hacking CTFs with Plain Agents3 Dec
  2. 2024HackSynth: LLM Agent and Evaluation Framework for Autonomous Penetration Testing2 Dec
  3. 2024Multi-Agent Collaboration in Incident Response with Large Language Models1 Dec
  4. 2024PentestAgent: Incorporating LLM Agents to Automated Penetration Testing7 Nov
  5. 2024EnIGMA: Interactive Tools Substantially Assist LM Agents in Finding Security Vulnerabilities24 Sep
  6. 2024AutoSafeCoder: A Multi-Agent Framework for Securing LLM Code Generation through Static Analysis and Fuzz Testing16 Sep

Other references · 23

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  3. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
  4. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
  5. 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Modelscited by 688
  6. 2023Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language Modelscited by 560
  7. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 238
  8. 2023ReWOO: Decoupling Reasoning from Observations for Efficient Augmented Language Modelscited by 184
  9. 2024More Agents Is All You Needcited by 180
  10. 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 164
  11. 2023Keep the Conversation Going: Fixing 162 out of 337 bugs for 0.42 each using ChatGPTcited by 125
  12. 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 93
11 more
  1. 2023Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPTcited by 53
  2. 2024An Empirical Evaluation of LLMs for Solving Offensive Security Challengescited by 35
  3. 2023From Text to MITRE Techniques: Exploring the Malicious Use of Large Language Models for Generating Cyber Attack Payloadscited by 32
  4. 2023Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questionscited by 23
  5. 2024Outside the Comfort Zone: Analysing LLM Capabilities in Software Vulnerability Detectioncited by 16
  6. 2023Revisiting Automated Prompting: Are We Actually Doing Better?cited by 7
  7. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models for Line-Level Vulnerability Localizationcited by 7
  8. 2020Benefits and Pitfalls of Using Capture the Flag Games in University Coursescited by 6
  9. 2023Battle Ground: Data Collection and Labeling of CTF Games to Understand Human Cyber Operatorscited by 2
  10. 2022Observations From an Online Security Competition and Its Implications on Crowdsourced Securitycited by 1
  11. 2022Capture the Flag for Team Construction in Cybersecuritycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 16.

20 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2025A Survey on Agentic Security: Applications, Threats and Defensescited by 20
  2. 2025CRAKEN: Cybersecurity LLM Agent with Knowledge-Based Executioncited by 14
  3. 2025Towards Effective Offensive Security LLM Agents: Hyperparameter Tuning, LLM as a Judge, and a Lightweight CTF Benchmarkcited by 12
  4. 2025From Trace to Line: LLM Agent for Real-World OSS Vulnerability Localizationcited by 4
  5. 2026CTFusion: A CTF-based Benchmark for LLM Agent Evaluationcited by 4
  6. 2026CTFExplorer: Evaluating LLM Offensive Agents Through Multi-Target Web CTF Benchmarkingcited by 3
  7. 2026CREBench: Evaluating Large Language Models in Cryptographic Binary Reverse Engineeringcited by 3
  8. 2026CrackMeBench: Binary Reverse Engineering for Agentscited by 2
  9. 2026CritBench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities of Large Language Models in IEC 61850 Digital Substation Environmentscited by 1
  10. 2026Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypotscited by 1
  11. 2026Cyber-Capable AI Agents: Vulnerabilities, Evaluation Containment, and Defensive Responsecited by 1
  12. 2026Beyond End-to-End Success: Diagnosing Failures in Long-Horizon Security LLM Agentscited by 1
8 more
  1. 2026How Do LLM Agents Actually Get the Flag? Trace-Level Provenance for Agentic Offensive Security Evaluationcited by 1
  2. 2026Systematic Capability Benchmarking of Frontier Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Taskscited by 0
  3. 2026RAVEN: Retrieval-Augmented Vulnerability Exploration Network for Memory Corruption Analysis in User Code and Binary Programscited by 0
  4. 2026uGen: An Agentic Framework for Generating Microarchitectural Attack PoCscited by 0
  5. 2026CyberEvolver: Structured Self-Evolution for Cybersecurity Agents On the Flycited by 0
  6. 2026Data-Centric Benchmarking of Exploit Generation in LLMs: Understanding the Impact of Fine-Tuningcited by 0
  7. 2026Reveree: Diagnosing LLM Reverse-Engineering Agentscited by 0
  8. 2026CAIRN: Dynamic Fact-Intent DAGs for Multi-Agent Explorationcited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Autonomous LLM Agents & CTFs: A Second Look
  2. 2026KryptoPilot: An Open-World Knowledge-Augmented LLM Agent for Automated Cryptographic Exploitation
  3. 2026STRIATUM-CTF: A Protocol-Driven Agentic Framework for General-Purpose CTF Solving
  4. 2026Do Agents Dream of Root Shells? Partial-Credit Evaluation of LLM Agents in Capture the Flag Challenges
  5. 2025Improving LLM Agents with Reinforcement Learning on Cryptographic CTF Challenges
  6. 2025Measuring and Augmenting Large Language Models for Solving Capture-the-Flag Challenges
  7. 2025MALCDF: A Distributed Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Real-Time Cyber
  8. 2026Co-RedTeam: Orchestrated Security Discovery and Exploitation with LLM Agents