mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Advancing TTP Analysis: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation

arXiv 2401.00280 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2023cs.CR cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) outline the methods attackers use to exploit vulnerabilities. The interpretation of TTPs in the MITRE ATT&CK framework can be challenging for cybersecurity practitioners due to presumed expertise and complex dependencies. Meanwhile, advancements with Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to recent surge in studies exploring its uses in cybersecurity operations. It is, however, unclear how LLMs can be used in an efficient and proper way to provide accurate responses for critical domains such as cybersecurity. This leads us to investigate how to better use two types of LLMs: small-scale encoder-only (e.g., RoBERTa) and larger decoder-only (e.g., GPT-3.5) LLMs to comprehend and summarize TTPs with the intended purposes (i.e., tactics) of a cyberattack procedure. This work studies and compares the uses of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of encoder-only LLMs vs. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for decoder-only LLMs (without fine-tuning). Both SFT and RAG techniques presumably enhance the LLMs with relevant contexts for each cyberattack procedure. Our studies show decoder-only LLMs with RAG achieves better performance than encoder-only models with SFT, particularly when directly relevant context is extracted by RAG. The decoder-only results could suffer low `Precision' while achieving high `Recall'. Our findings further highlight a counter-intuitive observation that more generic prompts tend to yield better predictions of cyberattack tactics than those that are more specifically tailored.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 18 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2023.

Builds on

18 of 31 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  6. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  7. 2016Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translationcited by 1,471
  8. 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
  9. 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,103
  10. 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 694
  11. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 457
  12. 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 189
6 more
  1. 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 130
  2. 2022SecureBERT: A Domain-Specific Language Model for Cybersecuritycited by 60
  3. 2022CySecBERT: A Domain-Adapted Language Model for the Cybersecurity Domaincited by 31
  4. 2022Automatic Mapping of Unstructured Cyber Threat Intelligence: An Experimental Studycited by 11
  5. 2023On the Uses of Large Language Models to Interpret Ambiguous Cyberattack Descriptionscited by 10
  6. 2022Towards Automated Classification of Attackers' TTPs by combining NLP with ML Techniquescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Adapting Large Language Models to Emerging Cybersecurity using Retrieval Augmented Generation
  2. 2025Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Applications, Vulnerabilities, and Defense Techniques
  3. 2026Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies
  4. 2026CyberLLM-FINDS 2025: Instruction-Tuned Fine-tuning of Domain-Specific LLMs with Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Graph Integration for MITRE Evaluation
  5. 2025From Texts to Shields: Convergence of Large Language Models and Cybersecurity
  6. 2025LLMpatronous: Harnessing the Power of LLMs For Vulnerability Detection
  7. 2025LLM-Assisted Proactive Threat Intelligence for Automated Reasoning
  8. 2024CyberMetric: A Benchmark Dataset based on Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Evaluating LLMs in Cybersecurity Knowledge