mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unveiling the Ambiguity in Neural Inverse Rendering: A Parameter Compensation Analysis

arXiv 2404.12819 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2024cs.CVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Inverse rendering aims to reconstruct the scene properties of objects solely from multiview images. However, it is an ill-posed problem prone to producing ambiguous estimations deviating from physically accurate representations. In this paper, we utilize Neural Microfacet Fields (NMF), a state-of-the-art neural inverse rendering method to illustrate the inherent ambiguity. We propose an evaluation framework to assess the degree of compensation or interaction between the estimated scene properties, aiming to explore the mechanisms behind this ill-posed problem and potential mitigation strategies. Specifically, we introduce artificial perturbations to one scene property and examine how adjusting another property can compensate for these perturbations. To facilitate such experiments, we introduce a disentangled NMF where material properties are independent. The experimental findings underscore the intrinsic ambiguity present in neural inverse rendering and highlight the importance of providing additional guidance through geometry, material, and illumination priors.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2024.

Builds on

25 of 35 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  2. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,698
  3. 2021Plenoxels: Radiance Fields without Neural Networkscited by 1,607
  4. 2022TensoRF: Tensorial Radiance Fieldscited by 1,275
  5. 2021Direct Voxel Grid Optimization: Super-fast Convergence for Radiance Fields Reconstructioncited by 961
  6. 2020Neural Sparse Voxel Fieldscited by 959
  7. 2021Ref-NeRF: Structured View-Dependent Appearance for Neural Radiance Fieldscited by 569
  8. 2020NeRV: Neural Reflectance and Visibility Fields for Relighting and View Synthesiscited by 493
  9. 2020NeRD: Neural Reflectance Decomposition from Image Collectionscited by 446
  10. 2021PhySG: Inverse Rendering with Spherical Gaussians for Physics-based Material Editing and Relightingcited by 332
  11. 2021Neural-PIL: Neural Pre-Integrated Lighting for Reflectance Decompositioncited by 204
  12. 2023TensoIR: Tensorial Inverse Renderingcited by 166
13 more
  1. 2021NeRFReN: Neural Radiance Fields with Reflectionscited by 121
  2. 2020Deep Reflectance Volumes: Relightable Reconstructions from Multi-View Photometric Imagescited by 98
  3. 2021ShaRF: Shape-conditioned Radiance Fields from a Single Viewcited by 92
  4. 2022PS-NeRF: Neural Inverse Rendering for Multi-view Photometric Stereocited by 69
  5. 2023ENVIDR: Implicit Differentiable Renderer with Neural Environment Lightingcited by 63
  6. 2022Improved Direct Voxel Grid Optimization for Radiance Fields Reconstructioncited by 61
  7. 2022Neural Radiance Transfer Fields for Relightable Novel-view Synthesis with Global Illuminationcited by 41
  8. 2023Neural Microfacet Fields for Inverse Renderingcited by 37
  9. 2023LightSim: Neural Lighting Simulation for Urban Scenescited by 20
  10. 2024SHINOBI: Shape and Illumination using Neural Object Decomposition via BRDF Optimization In-the-wildcited by 18
  11. 2022SIMBAR: Single Image-Based Scene Relighting For Effective Data Augmentation For Automated Driving Vision Taskscited by 15
  12. 2022Rotation-Equivariant Conditional Spherical Neural Fields for Learning a Natural Illumination Priorcited by 12
  13. 2023LANe: Lighting-Aware Neural Fields for Compositional Scene Synthesiscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.