mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Delving into Sample Loss Curve to Embrace Noisy and Imbalanced Data

arXiv 2201.00849 ↗First posted 30 Dec 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CVcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Corrupted labels and class imbalance are commonly encountered in practically collected training data, which easily leads to over-fitting of deep neural networks (DNNs). Existing approaches alleviate these issues by adopting a sample re-weighting strategy, which is to re-weight sample by designing weighting function. However, it is only applicable for training data containing only either one type of data biases. In practice, however, biased samples with corrupted labels and of tailed classes commonly co-exist in training data. How to handle them simultaneously is a key but under-explored problem. In this paper, we find that these two types of biased samples, though have similar transient loss, have distinguishable trend and characteristics in loss curves, which could provide valuable priors for sample weight assignment. Motivated by this, we delve into the loss curves and propose a novel probe-and-allocate training strategy: In the probing stage, we train the network on the whole biased training data without intervention, and record the loss curve of each sample as an additional attribute; In the allocating stage, we feed the resulting attribute to a newly designed curve-perception network, named CurveNet, to learn to identify the bias type of each sample and assign proper weights through meta-learning adaptively. The training speed of meta learning also blocks its application. To solve it, we propose a method named skip layer meta optimization (SLMO) to accelerate training speed by skipping the bottom layers. Extensive synthetic and real experiments well validate the proposed method, which achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple challenging benchmarks.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Dec 2021.

Builds on

32 of 55 references.

References · 32

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
  5. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  6. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  7. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  9. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  10. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 806
  11. 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
  12. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
20 more
  1. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  2. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  3. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 604
  4. 2017Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learningcited by 377
  5. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  6. 2018How to train your MAMLcited by 306
  7. 2020Equalization Loss for Long-Tailed Object Recognitioncited by 285
  8. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  9. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  10. 2018Large Scale Fine-Grained Categorization and Domain-Specific Transfer Learningcited by 174
  11. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  12. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  13. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  14. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  15. 2016Range Loss for Deep Face Recognition with Long-tailcited by 111
  16. 2017Class Rectification Hard Mining for Imbalanced Deep Learningcited by 67
  17. 2020Heteroskedastic and Imbalanced Deep Learning with Adaptive Regularizationcited by 49
  18. 2018Learning to Teach with Dynamic Loss Functionscited by 40
  19. 2021Faster Meta Update Strategy for Noise-Robust Deep Learningcited by 38
  20. 2018Small Sample Learning in Big Data Eracited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

16 papers.

Sort: