mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Uncertainty-Aware Learning Against Label Noise on Imbalanced Datasets

arXiv 2207.05471 ↗First posted 12 Jul 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 28

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning against label noise is a vital topic to guarantee a reliable performance for deep neural networks. Recent research usually refers to dynamic noise modeling with model output probabilities and loss values, and then separates clean and noisy samples. These methods have gained notable success. However, unlike cherry-picked data, existing approaches often cannot perform well when facing imbalanced datasets, a common scenario in the real world. We thoroughly investigate this phenomenon and point out two major issues that hinder the performance, i.e., inter-class loss distribution discrepancy and misleading predictions due to uncertainty. The first issue is that existing methods often perform class-agnostic noise modeling. However, loss distributions show a significant discrepancy among classes under class imbalance, and class-agnostic noise modeling can easily get confused with noisy samples and samples in minority classes. The second issue refers to that models may output misleading predictions due to epistemic uncertainty and aleatoric uncertainty, thus existing methods that rely solely on the output probabilities may fail to distinguish confident samples. Inspired by our observations, we propose an Uncertainty-aware Label Correction framework~(ULC) to handle label noise on imbalanced datasets. First, we perform epistemic uncertainty-aware class-specific noise modeling to identify trustworthy clean samples and refine/discard highly confident true/corrupted labels. Then, we introduce aleatoric uncertainty in the subsequent learning process to prevent noise accumulation in the label noise modeling process. We conduct experiments on several synthetic and real-world datasets. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, especially on imbalanced datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 28 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2022.

Builds on

36 of 49 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  4. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  6. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  7. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  8. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  9. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  10. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  11. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 809
  12. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
24 more
  1. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  2. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 560
  3. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 557
  4. 2017A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networkscited by 513
  5. 2015Variational Dropout and the Local Reparameterization Trickcited by 490
  6. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  7. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  8. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 413
  9. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  10. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  11. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  12. 2021In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 301
  13. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  14. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  15. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  16. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  17. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  18. 2019Gradient Descent with Early Stopping is Provably Robust to Label Noise for Overparameterized Neural Networkscited by 159
  19. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  20. 2018Masking: A New Perspective of Noisy Supervisioncited by 93
  21. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  22. 2014Training Convolutional Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 48
  23. 2019Robust Learning from Untrusted Sourcescited by 27
  24. 2020Combined Cleaning and Resampling Algorithm for Multi-Class Imbalanced Data with Label Noisecited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 9; 2025: 4; 2026: 7.

28 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  2. 2023Unbiased Scene Graph Generation in Videoscited by 39
  3. 2022Label-Noise Learning with Intrinsically Long-Tailed Datacited by 17
  4. 2025Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Surveycited by 14
  5. 2022Instance-dependent Label Distribution Estimation for Learning with Label Noisecited by 10
  6. 2024Estimating Noisy Class Posterior with Part-level Labels for Noisy Label Learningcited by 7
  7. 2022Rethinking Missing Data: Aleatoric Uncertainty-Aware Recommendationcited by 6
  8. 2022Dynamic Loss For Robust Learningcited by 6
  9. 2024Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selectioncited by 6
  10. 2023Expert Uncertainty and Severity Aware Chest X-Ray Classification by Multi-Relationship Graph Learningcited by 4
  11. 2024Dirichlet-based Per-Sample Weighting by Transition Matrix for Noisy Label Learningcited by 4
  12. 2024On the use of Silver Standard Data for Zero-shot Classification Tasks in Information Extractioncited by 3
16 more
  1. 2024Extracting Clean and Balanced Subset for Noisy Long-tailed Classificationcited by 3
  2. 2024ANNE: Adaptive Nearest Neighbors and Eigenvector-based Sample Selection for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 3
  3. 2026Diffusion Epistemic Uncertainty with Asymmetric Learning for Diffusion-Generated Image Detectioncited by 3
  4. 2023Training of Neural Networks with Uncertain Data: A Mixture of Experts Approachcited by 2
  5. 2024Distribution-Aware Robust Learning from Long-Tailed Data with Noisy Labelscited by 2
  6. 2025Classifying Long-tailed and Label-noise Data via Disentangling and Unlearningcited by 2
  7. 2025Dual-granularity Sinkhorn Distillation for Enhanced Learning from Long-tailed Noisy Datacited by 1
  8. 2026CARE: Class-Adaptive Expert Consensus for Reliable Learning with Long-Tailed Noisy Labelscited by 1
  9. 2024Addressing Long-Tail Noisy Label Learning Problems: a Two-Stage Solution with Label Refurbishment Considering Label Raritycited by 0
  10. 2024Self-Relaxed Joint Training: Sample Selection for Severity Estimation with Ordinal Noisy Labelscited by 0
  11. 2025Uncertainty Modeling for Multi-Objective RTA Interception with Distillation Accelerationcited by 0
  12. 2026DREAM: Dual-Standard Semantic Homogeneity with Dynamic Optimization for Graph Learning with Label Noisecited by 0
  13. 2026Learning from Imperfect Text Guidance: Robust Long-Tail Visual Recognition with High-Noise Labelcited by 0
  14. 2026Anti-Backdoor Coreset Selection via Cumulative Entropycited by 0
  15. 2026Beyond Performance Metrics: Uncertainty Mapping of Label Ambiguity in Fazekas Score Predictioncited by 0
  16. 2026Different Corruptions, Different Signals: Uncertainty and Loss in Federated Data Qualitycited by 0