mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labels

arXiv 2104.06574 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2021cs.LG stat.MLcited by 34

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with data with noisy labels is known to be a challenge. Based on the fact that directly providing the label to the data (Positive Learning; PL) has a risk of allowing CNNs to memorize the contaminated labels for the case of noisy data, the indirect learning approach that uses complementary labels (Negative Learning for Noisy Labels; NLNL) has proven to be highly effective in preventing overfitting to noisy data as it reduces the risk of providing faulty target. NLNL further employs a three-stage pipeline to improve convergence. As a result, filtering noisy data through the NLNL pipeline is cumbersome, increasing the training cost. In this study, we propose a novel improvement of NLNL, named Joint Negative and Positive Learning (JNPL), that unifies the filtering pipeline into a single stage. JNPL trains CNN via two losses, NL+ and PL+, which are improved upon NL and PL loss functions, respectively. We analyze the fundamental issue of NL loss function and develop new NL+ loss function producing gradient that enhances the convergence of noisy data. Furthermore, PL+ loss function is designed to enable faster convergence to expected-to-be-clean data. We show that the NL+ and PL+ train CNN simultaneously, significantly simplifying the pipeline, allowing greater ease of practical use compared to NLNL. With a simple semi-supervised training technique, our method achieves state-of-the-art accuracy for noisy data classification based on the superior filtering ability.

Key facts. Cited by 34 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2021.

Builds on

27 of 35 references.

References · 27

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  3. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  4. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  6. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  7. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
  8. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  9. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  10. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  11. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  12. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
15 more
  1. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  2. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  3. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  4. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  5. 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
  6. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 160
  7. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  8. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  9. 2017Learning From Noisy Large-Scale Datasets With Minimal Supervisioncited by 115
  10. 2017Toward Robustness against Label Noise in Training Deep Discriminative Neural Networkscited by 78
  11. 2014Making Risk Minimization Tolerant to Label Noisecited by 54
  12. 2017Learning with Confident Examples: Rank Pruning for Robust Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 52
  13. 2020Improving Generalization by Controlling Label-Noise Information in Neural Network Weightscited by 35
  14. 2017Learning Deep Networks from Noisy Labels with Dropout Regularizationcited by 32
  15. 2018A Semi-Supervised Two-Stage Approach to Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 13; 2023: 6; 2024: 8; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

34 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labelscited by 218
  2. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 138
  3. 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
  4. 2023Guiding Pseudo-labels with Uncertainty Estimation for Source-free Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 63
  5. 2023Continual Test-time Domain Adaptation via Dynamic Sample Selectioncited by 35
  6. 2022Joint-Modal Label Denoising for Weakly-Supervised Audio-Visual Video Parsingcited by 29
  7. 2023Adaptive Integration of Partial Label Learning and Negative Learning for Enhanced Noisy Label Learningcited by 22
  8. 2023Rethinking Weak Supervision in Helping Contrastive Learningcited by 18
  9. 2022Centrality and Consistency: Two-Stage Clean Samples Identification for Learning with Instance-Dependent Noisy Labelscited by 16
  10. 2022Translation Consistent Semi-supervised Segmentation for 3D Medical Imagescited by 13
  11. 2022CrossSplit: Mitigating Label Noise Memorization through Data Splittingcited by 12
  12. 2022L2B: Learning to Bootstrap Robust Models for Combating Label Noisecited by 10
22 more
  1. 2023Manifold DivideMix: A Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning Framework for Severe Label Noisecited by 9
  2. 2023Using Unreliable Pseudo-Labels for Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentationcited by 8
  3. 2024Noisy Label Processing for Classification: A Surveycited by 8
  4. 2022PARS: Pseudo-Label Aware Robust Sample Selection for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 7
  5. 2024Dirichlet-Based Prediction Calibration for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 7
  6. 2024Learning with Imbalanced Noisy Data by Preventing Bias in Sample Selectioncited by 6
  7. 2022Weakly-Supervised Temporal Action Localization by Progressive Complementary Learningcited by 5
  8. 2024Learning with Noisy Labels: Interconnection of Two Expectation-Maximizationscited by 4
  9. 2022Tripartite: Tackle Noisy Labels by a More Precise Partitioncited by 3
  10. 2024Active Negative Loss: A Robust Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 3
  11. 2022Combating Noisy Labels in Long-Tailed Image Classificationcited by 2
  12. 2024Fully Test-Time Adaptation for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 2
  13. 2026Can LLMs Learn to Reason Robustly under Noisy Supervision?cited by 2
  14. 2022Learning from Data with Noisy Labels Using Temporal Self-Ensemblecited by 1
  15. 2025Think Twice before Adaptation: Improving Adaptability of DeepFake Detection via Online Test-Time Adaptationcited by 1
  16. 2025Unlearning the Noisy Correspondence Makes CLIP More Robustcited by 1
  17. 2022On Robust Learning from Noisy Labels: A Permutation Layer Approachcited by 0
  18. 2024Uncertainty-guided Open-Set Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Target-private Class Segregationcited by 0
  19. 2025FixCLR: Negative-Class Contrastive Learning for Semi-Supervised Domain Generalizationcited by 0
  20. 2026Variational Rectification Inference for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 0
  21. 2026Robust Losses from Univariate Base Functions for Noisy-Label Learningcited by 0
  22. 2026From Detrimental to Beneficial: Dynamic Influence-based Valuation and Editingcited by 0