mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Two-Timescale Q-Learning with Function Approximation in Zero-Sum Stochastic Games

arXiv 2312.04905 ↗First posted 8 Dec 2023cs.LG cs.MAcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider two-player zero-sum stochastic games and propose a two-timescale Q-learning algorithm with function approximation that is payoff-based, convergent, rational, and symmetric between the two players. In two-timescale Q-learning, the fast-timescale iterates are updated in spirit to the stochastic gradient descent and the slow-timescale iterates (which we use to compute the policies) are updated by taking a convex combination between its previous iterate and the latest fast-timescale iterate. Introducing the slow timescale as well as its update equation marks as our main algorithmic novelty. In the special case of linear function approximation, we establish, to the best of our knowledge, the first last-iterate finite-sample bound for payoff-based independent learning dynamics of these types. The result implies a polynomial sample complexity to find a Nash equilibrium in such stochastic games. To establish the results, we model our proposed algorithm as a two-timescale stochastic approximation and derive the finite-sample bound through a Lyapunov-based approach. The key novelty lies in constructing a valid Lyapunov function to capture the evolution of the slow-timescale iterates. Specifically, through a change of variable, we show that the update equation of the slow-timescale iterates resembles the classical smoothed best-response dynamics, where the regularized Nash gap serves as a valid Lyapunov function. This insight enables us to construct a valid Lyapunov function via a generalized variant of the Moreau envelope of the regularized Nash gap. The construction of our Lyapunov function might be of broad independent interest in studying the behavior of stochastic approximation algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 126 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Dec 2023.

Builds on

23 of 126 references.

References · 23

  1. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  2. 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 311
  3. 2021V-Learning -- A Simple, Efficient, Decentralized Algorithm for Multiagent RLcited by 114
  4. 2019Finite-Sample Analysis of Nonlinear Stochastic Approximation with Applications in Reinforcement Learningcited by 67
  5. 2021A Lyapunov Theory for Finite-Sample Guarantees of Asynchronous Q-Learning and TD-Learning Variantscited by 57
  6. 2022The Complexity of Markov Equilibrium in Stochastic Gamescited by 49
  7. 2022The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learningcited by 42
  8. 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
  9. 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagency: Provably Efficient Decentralized Multi-Agent RL with Function Approximationcited by 30
  10. 2023Uncoupled and Convergent Learning in Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Games with Bandit Feedbackcited by 30
  11. 2023Breaking the Curse of Multiagents in a Large State Space: RL in Markov Games with Independent Linear Function Approximationcited by 27
  12. 2022Regret Minimization and Convergence to Equilibria in General-sum Markov Gamescited by 24
11 more
  1. 2021Independent Learning in Stochastic Gamescited by 22
  2. 2021Provably Efficient Policy Optimization for Two-Player Zero-Sum Markov Gamescited by 18
  3. 2022Representation Learning for General-sum Low-rank Markov Gamescited by 15
  4. 2023A Finite-Sample Analysis of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Gamescited by 15
  5. 2023On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoringcited by 15
  6. 2022Unified Algorithms for RL with Decision-Estimation Coefficients: PAC, Reward-Free, Preference-Based Learning, and Beyondcited by 10
  7. 2023Hardness of Independent Learning and Sparse Equilibrium Computation in Markov Gamescited by 10
  8. 2023Can We Find Nash Equilibria at a Linear Rate in Markov Games?cited by 9
  9. 2023Stability of Q-Learning Through Design and Optimismcited by 8
  10. 2021Finite-Sample Analysis of Decentralized Q-Learning for Stochastic Gamescited by 4
  11. 2023Finite-sample Guarantees for Nash Q-learning with Linear Function Approximationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.