mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Minimal-Assumption Analysis of Q-Learning with Time-Varying Policies

arXiv 2510.16132 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2025cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 4

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we present the first finite-time analysis of Q-learning with time-varying learning policies (i.e., on-policy sampling) for discounted Markov decision processes under minimal assumptions, requiring only the existence of a policy that induces an irreducible Markov chain over the state space. We establish a last-iterate convergence rate for mathbbE[|Qk - Q^*|_∞2], implying a sample complexity of order O(1/xi2) for achieving mathbbE[|Qk - Q^*|_∞]≤ xi. This matches the rate of off-policy Q-learning, but with worse dependence on exploration-related parameters. We also derive a finite-time rate for mathbbE[|Qπk - Q^*|_∞2], where πk is the learning policy at iteration k, highlighting the exploration-exploitation trade-off in on-policy Q-learning. While exploration is weaker than in off-policy methods, on-policy learning enjoys an exploitation advantage as the learning policy converges to an optimal one. Numerical results support our theory. Technically, rapidly time-varying learning policies induce time-inhomogeneous Markovian noise, creating significant analytical challenges under minimal exploration. To address this, we develop a Poisson-equation-based decomposition of the Markovian noise under a lazy transition matrix, separating it into a martingale-difference term and residual terms. The residuals are controlled via sensitivity analysis of the Poisson equation solution with respect to both the Q-function estimate and the learning policy. These techniques may extend to other RL algorithms with time-varying policies, such as single-timescale actor-critic methods and learning-in-games algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 34 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2025.

Builds on

34 of 71 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Linear Q-Learning Does Not Diverge in L2: Convergence Rates to a Bounded Set31 Jan
  2. 2024Stochastic Approximation with Unbounded Markovian Noise: A General-Purpose Theorem29 Oct
  3. 2024Constant Stepsize Q-learning: Distributional Convergence, Bias and Extrapolation25 Jan

Other references · 31

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,745
  3. 2015End-to-End Training of Deep Visuomotor Policiescited by 875
  4. 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 669
  5. 2018Is Q-learning Provably Efficient?cited by 487
  6. 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 229
  7. 2021Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A surveycited by 188
  8. 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 166
  9. 2020A Finite Time Analysis of Two Time-Scale Actor Critic Methodscited by 122
  10. 2020Finite-Time Analysis of Asynchronous Stochastic Approximation and Q-Learningcited by 96
  11. 2020Sample Complexity of Asynchronous Q-Learning: Sharper Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 95
  12. 2019Finite-Sample Analysis for SARSA with Linear Function Approximationcited by 85
19 more
  1. 2019Stochastic approximation with cone-contractive operators: Sharp ℓ_∞-bounds for Q-learningcited by 77
  2. 2019Variance-reduced Q-learning is minimax optimalcited by 73
  3. 2020Q-learning with Logarithmic Regretcited by 60
  4. 2021Finite Sample Analysis of Two-Time-Scale Natural Actor-Critic Algorithmcited by 39
  5. 2023The Blessing of Heterogeneity in Federated Q-Learning: Linear Speedup and Beyondcited by 36
  6. 2022Target Network and Truncation Overcome The Deadly Triad in Q-Learningcited by 31
  7. 2021A Statistical Analysis of Polyak-Ruppert Averaged Q-learningcited by 29
  8. 2022Near Sample-Optimal Reduction-based Policy Learning for Average Reward MDPcited by 29
  9. 2023Sharper Model-free Reinforcement Learning for Average-reward Markov Decision Processescited by 29
  10. 2021Sample and Communication-Efficient Decentralized Actor-Critic Algorithms with Finite-Time Analysiscited by 26
  11. 2021Concentration of Contractive Stochastic Approximation and Reinforcement Learningcited by 23
  12. 2021Instance-optimality in optimal value estimation: Adaptivity via variance-reduced Q-learningcited by 22
  13. 2022Global Convergence of Localized Policy Iteration in Networked Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
  14. 2020Sample Complexity Bounds for Two Timescale Value-based Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 19
  15. 2022On the Convergence of SARSA with Linear Function Approximationcited by 15
  16. 2023A Finite-Sample Analysis of Payoff-Based Independent Learning in Zero-Sum Stochastic Gamescited by 15
  17. 2022Final Iteration Convergence Bound of Q-Learning: Switching System Approachcited by 9
  18. 2023Smoothed Q-learningcited by 2
  19. 2023Two-Timescale Q-Learning with Function Approximation in Zero-Sum Stochastic Gamescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Hitting-Time Bounds for Asynchronous Q-Learning
  2. 2025Quantizer Design for Finite Model Approximations, Model Learning, and Quantized Q-Learning for MDPs with Unbounded Spaces
  3. 2021Q-Learning for MDPs with General Spaces: Convergence and Near Optimality via Quantization under Weak Continuity
  4. 2026Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximation for Non-Markov Processes
  5. 2022Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexity
  6. 2026Sample Complexity of Average-Reward Q-Learning: From Single-agent to Federated Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2025Non-stationary and Varying-discounting Markov Decision Processes for Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2026Achieving varepsilon-2 Dependence for Average-Reward Q-Learning with a New Contraction Principle