mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exact Regret Frontiers and Externality Scheduling in Centralized Serial-Dictatorship Bandits

arXiv 2609.19963 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2026cs.GT cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Exploration in centralized serial-dictatorship matching bandits must use complete matchings, so learning one player-arm pair can impose regret on others. We study this externality under a known common priority order and Gaussian rewards with unit variance. We show that the matching-level Graves-Lai constraints reduce to finitely many pairwise exploration quotas and, at top-choice-separated instances, yield a polynomial-size marginal linear program. At these instances, the exact attainable set of expected logarithmic regret coefficients is G(θ)X(θ), where X is the feasible matching-allocation set and G maps allocations to player regret. The usual upper-closed Graves-Lai region can be strictly larger despite having the same Pareto-minimal boundary. We further show that identical exploration quotas can induce very different regret through their scheduling. Finally, we construct estimate-solve-track policies, uniformly good on the full row-strict class, that attain every fixed positively weighted optimum without assuming optimizer uniqueness. Every Pareto-minimal point is pointwise attainable, possibly through an instance-calibrated target.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2026.

Builds on

24 of 58 references.

References · 24

  1. 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 239
  2. 2016Explore First, Exploit Next: The True Shape of Regret in Bandit Problemscited by 79
  3. 2019Pure Exploration with Multiple Correct Answerscited by 64
  4. 2019Competing Bandits in Matching Marketscited by 56
  5. 2017Minimal Exploration in Structured Stochastic Banditscited by 41
  6. 2021Fair Exploration via Axiomatic Bargainingcited by 22
  7. 2018The Externalities of Exploration and How Data Diversity Helps Exploitationcited by 20
  8. 2021Regret, stability & fairness in matching markets with bandit learnerscited by 20
  9. 2023Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 17
  10. 2015The Pareto Regret Frontier for Banditscited by 14
  11. 2020Optimal Learning for Structured Banditscited by 14
  12. 2024Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learningcited by 7
12 more
  1. 2025Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching for Two-Sided Markets Under Uncertaintycited by 5
  2. 2021Asymptotically Optimal Strategies For Combinatorial Semi-Bandits in Polynomial Timecited by 4
  3. 2025Competing Bandits in Matching Markets via Super Stabilitycited by 4
  4. 2022The Pareto Frontier of Instance-Dependent Guarantees in Multi-Player Multi-Armed Bandits with no Communicationcited by 2
  5. 2024Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectivescited by 2
  6. 2026Probably Correct Optimal Stable Matching under Two-Sided Uncertaintycited by 2
  7. 2025Optimal Algorithms for Bandit Learning in Matching Marketscited by 1
  8. 2025Multimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 1
  9. 2025Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorshipcited by 1
  10. 2026Regret Analysis of Sleeping Competing Banditscited by 1
  11. 2026Adaptive Bandit Algorithms for Contextual Matching Marketscited by 1
  12. 2026Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.