mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transcendental Idealism of Planner: Evaluating Perception from Planning Perspective for Autonomous Driving

arXiv 2306.07276 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2023cs.CV cs.ROcited by 9

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → End-to-end system architecture

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating the performance of perception modules in autonomous driving is one of the most critical tasks in developing the complex intelligent system. While module-level unit test metrics adopted from traditional computer vision tasks are feasible to some extent, it remains far less explored to measure the impact of perceptual noise on the driving quality of autonomous vehicles in a consistent and holistic manner. In this work, we propose a principled framework that provides a coherent and systematic understanding of the impact an error in the perception module imposes on an autonomous agent's planning that actually controls the vehicle. Specifically, the planning process is formulated as expected utility maximisation, where all input signals from upstream modules jointly provide a world state description, and the planner strives for the optimal action by maximising the expected utility determined by both world states and actions. We show that, under practical conditions, the objective function can be represented as an inner product between the world state description and the utility function in a Hilbert space. This geometric interpretation enables a novel way to analyse the impact of noise in world state estimation on planning and leads to a universal metric for evaluating perception. The whole framework resembles the idea of transcendental idealism in the classical philosophical literature, which gives the name to our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 31 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.

Builds on

31 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Multi-Modal Fusion Transformer for End-to-End Autonomous Driving19 Apr
  2. 2021End-to-end Interpretable Neural Motion Planner17 Jan

Other references · 29

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  3. 2019Scalability in Perception for Autonomous Driving: Waymo Open Datasetcited by 2,436
  4. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  5. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  6. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  7. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  8. 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 890
  9. 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Drivingcited by 401
  10. 2018ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worstcited by 391
  11. 2019Class-balanced Grouping and Sampling for Point Cloud 3D Object Detectioncited by 350
  12. 2019Exploring the Limitations of Behavior Cloning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 343
17 more
  1. 2019Causal Confusion in Imitation Learningcited by 286
  2. 2018Learning to Drive in a Daycited by 266
  3. 2016A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehiclescited by 251
  4. 2020Perceive, Predict, and Plan: Safe Motion Planning Through Interpretable Semantic Representationscited by 150
  5. 2020A Review and Comparative Study on Probabilistic Object Detection in Autonomous Drivingcited by 115
  6. 2018Baidu Apollo EM Motion Plannercited by 99
  7. 2017Imitating Driver Behavior with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 92
  8. 2019An investigation of model-free planningcited by 64
  9. 2021Exploring Simple 3D Multi-Object Tracking for Autonomous Drivingcited by 56
  10. 2023PillarNeXt: Rethinking Network Designs for 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 54
  11. 2020Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric Metricscited by 49
  12. 2023ProphNet: Efficient Agent-Centric Motion Forecasting with Anchor-Informed Proposalscited by 47
  13. 2021Self-Supervised Pillar Motion Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 44
  14. 2022Hierarchical Model-Based Imitation Learning for Planning in Autonomous Drivingcited by 43
  15. 2018Search-based optimal motion planning for automated drivingcited by 24
  16. 2021Injecting Planning-Awareness into Prediction and Detection Evaluationcited by 21
  17. 2021Revisiting 3D Object Detection From an Egocentric Perspectivecited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Perception in Plan: Coupled Perception and Planning for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  2. 2022Planning-oriented Autonomous Driving
  3. 2026Planning-Oriented End-to-End Autonomous Driving: Architectures, Evaluation, and Emerging Paradigms
  4. 2026What's Hidden Matters: Identifying Planning-Critical Occluded Agents using Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026AutoDrive-P3: Unified Chain of Perception-Prediction-Planning Thought via Reinforcement Fine-Tuning
  6. 2026Lost in Fog: Sensor Perturbations Expose Reasoning Fragility in Driving VLAs
  7. 2022Distribution-aware Goal Prediction and Conformant Model-based Planning for Safe Autonomous Driving
  8. 2026Operating Within the Operational Design Domain: Zero-Shot Perception with Vision-Language Models