mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Checklist to Define the Identification of TP, FP, and FN Object Detections in Automated Driving

arXiv 2308.07106 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2023cs.CV cs.ROcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The object perception of automated driving systems must pass quality and robustness tests before a safe deployment. Such tests typically identify true positive (TP), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) detections and aggregate them to metrics. Since the literature seems to be lacking a comprehensive way to define the identification of TPs/FPs/FNs, this paper provides a checklist of relevant functional aspects and implementation details. Besides labeling policies of the test set, we cover areas of vision, occlusion handling, safety-relevant areas, matching criteria, temporal and probabilistic issues, and further aspects. Even though the checklist cannot be fully formalized, it can help practitioners minimize the ambiguity of their tests, which, in turn, makes statements on object perception more reliable and comparable.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2023.

Builds on

21 of 50 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,523
  2. 2020HOTA: A Higher Order Metric for Evaluating Multi-Object Trackingcited by 552
  3. 2019The inD Dataset: A Drone Dataset of Naturalistic Road User Trajectories at German Intersectionscited by 137
  4. 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 131
  5. 2020Learning to Evaluate Perception Models Using Planner-Centric Metricscited by 49
  6. 20193D Multi-Object Tracking: A Baseline and New Evaluation Metricscited by 47
  7. 2022A Survey on Automated Driving System Testing: Landscapes and Trendscited by 36
  8. 2020Safety Concerns and Mitigation Approaches Regarding the Use of Deep Learning in Safety-Critical Perception Taskscited by 31
  9. 20206-Layer Model for a Structured Description and Categorization of Urban Traffic and Environmentcited by 26
  10. 2021Injecting Planning-Awareness into Prediction and Detection Evaluationcited by 21
  11. 2020How Trustworthy are Performance Evaluations for Basic Vision Tasks?cited by 14
  12. 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake Systemcited by 14
9 more
  1. 2020Inferring Spatial Uncertainty in Object Detectioncited by 10
  2. 2021Risk Ranked Recall: Collision Safety Metric for Object Detection Systems in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 10
  3. 2019A Delay Metric for Video Object Detection: What Average Precision Fails to Tellcited by 9
  4. 2021A Review of Testing Object-Based Environment Perception for Safe Automated Drivingcited by 9
  5. 2023Transcendental Idealism of Planner: Evaluating Perception from Planning Perspective for Autonomous Drivingcited by 9
  6. 2022Evaluating Object (mis)Detection from a Safety and Reliability Perspective: Discussion and Measurescited by 8
  7. 2019On the validation of complex systems operating in open contextscited by 6
  8. 2023SURE-Val: Safe Urban Relevance Extension and Validationcited by 3
  9. 2022MTBF Model for AVs -- From Perception Errors to Vehicle-Level Failurescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.