mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

GenCorres: Consistent Shape Matching via Coupled Implicit-Explicit Shape Generative Models

arXiv 2304.10523 ↗First posted 20 Apr 2023cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces GenCorres, a novel unsupervised joint shape matching (JSM) approach. Our key idea is to learn a mesh generator to fit an unorganized deformable shape collection while constraining deformations between adjacent synthetic shapes to preserve geometric structures such as local rigidity and local conformality. GenCorres presents three appealing advantages over existing JSM techniques. First, GenCorres performs JSM among a synthetic shape collection whose size is much bigger than the input shapes and fully leverages the datadriven power of JSM. Second, GenCorres unifies consistent shape matching and pairwise matching (i.e., by enforcing deformation priors between adjacent synthetic shapes). Third, the generator provides a concise encoding of consistent shape correspondences. However, learning a mesh generator from an unorganized shape collection is challenging, requiring a good initialization. GenCorres addresses this issue by learning an implicit generator from the input shapes, which provides intermediate shapes between two arbitrary shapes. We introduce a novel approach for computing correspondences between adjacent implicit surfaces, which we use to regularize the implicit generator. Synthetic shapes of the implicit generator then guide initial fittings (i.e., via template-based deformation) for learning the mesh generator. Experimental results show that GenCorres considerably outperforms state-of-the-art JSM techniques. The synthetic shapes of GenCorres also achieve salient performance gains against state-of-the-art deformable shape generators.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 47 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2023.

Builds on

47 of 95 references.

References · 47

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
  3. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  4. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,037
  5. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  6. 2016A Point Set Generation Network for 3D Object Reconstruction from a Single Imagecited by 972
  7. 2019PIFu: Pixel-Aligned Implicit Function for High-Resolution Clothed Human Digitizationcited by 818
  8. 2021Diffusion Probabilistic Models for 3D Point Cloud Generationcited by 734
  9. 2020Implicit Geometric Regularization for Learning Shapescited by 707
  10. 2020Neural Body: Implicit Neural Representations with Structured Latent Codes for Novel View Synthesis of Dynamic Humanscited by 634
  11. 2020PIFuHD: Multi-Level Pixel-Aligned Implicit Function for High-Resolution 3D Human Digitizationcited by 521
  12. 2019SAL: Sign Agnostic Learning of Shapes from Raw Datacited by 389
35 more
  1. 20163D Menagerie: Modeling the 3D shape and pose of animalscited by 310
  2. 2018Generating 3D faces using Convolutional Mesh Autoencoderscited by 267
  3. 2020Learning Gradient Fields for Shape Generationcited by 245
  4. 2019PU-GAN: a Point Cloud Upsampling Adversarial Networkcited by 162
  5. 20183D-CODED : 3D Correspondences by Deep Deformationcited by 160
  6. 2017Deep Functional Maps: Structured Prediction for Dense Shape Correspondencecited by 134
  7. 2020Deep Geometric Functional Maps: Robust Feature Learning for Shape Correspondencecited by 125
  8. 2020Deformed Implicit Field: Modeling 3D Shapes with Learned Dense Correspondencecited by 119
  9. 2020SALD: Sign Agnostic Learning with Derivativescited by 115
  10. 2021imGHUM: Implicit Generative Models of 3D Human Shape and Articulated Posecited by 102
  11. 2016Universal Correspondence Networkcited by 82
  12. 2018Unsupervised Deep Learning for Structured Shape Matchingcited by 81
  13. 2021NeuroMorph: Unsupervised Shape Interpolation and Correspondence in One Gocited by 81
  14. 2018Continuous and Orientation-preserving Correspondences via Functional Mapscited by 77
  15. 2020Deep Shells: Unsupervised Shape Correspondence with Optimal Transportcited by 74
  16. 2019Smooth Shells: Multi-Scale Shape Registration with Functional Mapscited by 72
  17. 2017Variational Autoencoders for Deforming 3D Mesh Modelscited by 69
  18. 2020Fully Convolutional Mesh Autoencoder using Efficient Spatially Varying Kernelscited by 53
  19. 2017Deformable Shape Completion with Graph Convolutional Autoencoderscited by 50
  20. 2021ARAPReg: An As-Rigid-As Possible Regularization Loss for Learning Deformable Shape Generatorscited by 40
  21. 2022Learning Multi-resolution Functional Maps with Spectral Attention for Robust Shape Matchingcited by 35
  22. 2020Isometric Multi-Shape Matchingcited by 33
  23. 2017Product Manifold Filter: Non-Rigid Shape Correspondence via Kernel Density Estimation in the Product Spacecited by 30
  24. 2019Learning Transformation Synchronizationcited by 29
  25. 2020Learning Implicit Functions for Topology-Varying Dense 3D Shape Correspondencecited by 27
  26. 2015Dense Human Body Correspondences Using Convolutional Networkscited by 26
  27. 2021Learning 3D Dense Correspondence via Canonical Point Autoencodercited by 21
  28. 2019DEMEA: Deep Mesh Autoencoders for Non-Rigidly Deforming Objectscited by 20
  29. 2021Augmenting Implicit Neural Shape Representations with Explicit Deformation Fieldscited by 19
  30. 2014Near-Optimal Joint Object Matching via Convex Relaxationcited by 17
  31. 2021GLASS: Geometric Latent Augmentation for Shape Spacescited by 16
  32. 2020Hamiltonian Dynamics for Real-World Shape Interpolationcited by 13
  33. 2022Implicit field supervision for robust non-rigid shape matchingcited by 13
  34. 2020Intrinsic Point Cloud Interpolation via Dual Latent Space Navigationcited by 8
  35. 2021Temporally-Coherent Surface Reconstruction via Metric-Consistent Atlasescited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

11 papers.