Learning with Noisy Labels Using Collaborative Sample Selection and Contrastive Semi-Supervised Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning with noisy labels (LNL) has been extensively studied, with existing approaches typically following a framework that alternates between clean sample selection and semi-supervised learning (SSL). However, this approach has a limitation: the clean set selected by the Deep Neural Network (DNN) classifier, trained through self-training, inevitably contains noisy samples. This mixture of clean and noisy samples leads to misguidance in DNN training during SSL, resulting in impaired generalization performance due to confirmation bias caused by error accumulation in sample selection. To address this issue, we propose a method called Collaborative Sample Selection (CSS), which leverages the large-scale pre-trained model CLIP. CSS aims to remove the mixed noisy samples from the identified clean set. We achieve this by training a 2-Dimensional Gaussian Mixture Model (2D-GMM) that combines the probabilities from CLIP with the predictions from the DNN classifier. To further enhance the adaptation of CLIP to LNL, we introduce a co-training mechanism with a contrastive loss in semi-supervised learning. This allows us to jointly train the prompt of CLIP and the DNN classifier, resulting in improved feature representation, boosted classification performance of DNNs, and reciprocal benefits to our Collaborative Sample Selection. By incorporating auxiliary information from CLIP and utilizing prompt fine-tuning, we effectively eliminate noisy samples from the clean set and mitigate confirmation bias during training. Experimental results on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method in comparison with the state-of-the-art approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.
Builds on
48 of 65 references.
References · 48
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
- 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,612
- 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,427
36 more
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
- 2019VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Languagecited by 1,291
- 2021ViLT: Vision-and-Language Transformer Without Convolution or Region Supervisioncited by 1,224
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2021StyleCLIP: Text-Driven Manipulation of StyleGAN Imagerycited by 990
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
- 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 580
- 2021DenseCLIP: Language-Guided Dense Prediction with Context-Aware Promptingcited by 530
- 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 441
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
- 2021Towards Open World Object Detectioncited by 297
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2021Contrastive Learning based Hybrid Networks for Long-Tailed Image Classificationcited by 130
- 2022Selective-Supervised Contrastive Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 112
- 2019Meta Label Correction for Noisy Label Learningcited by 108
- 2019Curriculum Loss: Robust Learning and Generalization against Label Corruptioncited by 87
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2021Jo-SRC: A Contrastive Approach for Combating Noisy Labelscited by 80
- 2022UNICON: Combating Label Noise Through Uniform Selection and Contrastive Learningcited by 77
- 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
- 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalizationcited by 33
- 2020From Symmetry to Geometry: Tractable Nonconvex Problemscited by 28
- 2022On Learning Contrastive Representations for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 21
- 2020NoiseRank: Unsupervised Label Noise Reduction with Dependence Modelscited by 20
- 2023Label-Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models for Learning from Noisy Labelscited by 20
- 2021PropMix: Hard Sample Filtering and Proportional MixUp for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 17
- 2022Compressing Features for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 7
- 2021Consistency issues in Gaussian Mixture Models reduction algorithmscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.