mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Discriminative Dynamics with Label Corruption for Noisy Label Detection

arXiv 2405.19902 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.LG stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Label noise, commonly found in real-world datasets, has a detrimental impact on a model's generalization. To effectively detect incorrectly labeled instances, previous works have mostly relied on distinguishable training signals, such as training loss, as indicators to differentiate between clean and noisy labels. However, they have limitations in that the training signals incompletely reveal the model's behavior and are not effectively generalized to various noise types, resulting in limited detection accuracy. In this paper, we propose DynaCor framework that distinguishes incorrectly labeled instances from correctly labeled ones based on the dynamics of the training signals. To cope with the absence of supervision for clean and noisy labels, DynaCor first introduces a label corruption strategy that augments the original dataset with intentionally corrupted labels, enabling indirect simulation of the model's behavior on noisy labels. Then, DynaCor learns to identify clean and noisy instances by inducing two clearly distinguishable clusters from the latent representations of training dynamics. Our comprehensive experiments show that DynaCor outperforms the state-of-the-art competitors and shows strong robustness to various noise types and noise rates.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

45 of 69 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  5. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  6. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  7. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
  8. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  9. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 763
  10. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
  11. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 670
  12. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
33 more
  1. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 499
  2. 2020Dataset Cartography: Mapping and Diagnosing Datasets with Training Dynamicscited by 423
  3. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
  4. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  5. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  6. 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
  7. 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
  8. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  9. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  10. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  11. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  12. 2017CleanNet: Transfer Learning for Scalable Image Classifier Training with Label Noisecited by 181
  13. 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
  14. 2021Comparing Kullback-Leibler Divergence and Mean Squared Error Loss in Knowledge Distillationcited by 131
  15. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  16. 2015Webly Supervised Learning of Convolutional Networkscited by 95
  17. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  18. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 58
  19. 2021Detecting Corrupted Labels Without Training a Model to Predictcited by 57
  20. 2022ProMix: Combating Label Noise via Maximizing Clean Sample Utilitycited by 48
  21. 2017Deep Learning from Noisy Image Labels with Quality Embeddingcited by 46
  22. 2021Towards Understanding Deep Learning from Noisy Labels with Small-Loss Criterioncited by 36
  23. 2022Self-Filtering: A Noise-Aware Sample Selection for Label Noise with Confidence Penalizationcited by 33
  24. 2017Learning Deep Networks from Noisy Labels with Dropout Regularizationcited by 32
  25. 2021Deep Active Learning by Leveraging Training Dynamicscited by 32
  26. 2020Weakly Supervised Learning with Side Information for Noisy Labeled Imagescited by 30
  27. 2021Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels via Regularization between Representationscited by 26
  28. 2020Salvage Reusable Samples from Noisy Data for Robust Learningcited by 19
  29. 2022Robustness to Label Noise Depends on the Shape of the Noise Distribution in Feature Spacecited by 15
  30. 2020Policy Learning Using Weak Supervisioncited by 13
  31. 2021Sample Prior Guided Robust Model Learning to Suppress Noisy Labelscited by 8
  32. 2022Label Noise-Robust Learning using a Confidence-Based Sieving Strategycited by 6
  33. 2023Differences Between Hard and Noisy-labeled Samples: An Empirical Studycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 5.

8 papers.