mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AI

arXiv 2204.01075 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2022cs.HC cs.AI cs.DBcited by 169

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As research and industry moves towards large-scale models capable of numerous downstream tasks, the complexity of understanding multi-modal datasets that give nuance to models rapidly increases. A clear and thorough understanding of a dataset's origins, development, intent, ethical considerations and evolution becomes a necessary step for the responsible and informed deployment of models, especially those in people-facing contexts and high-risk domains. However, the burden of this understanding often falls on the intelligibility, conciseness, and comprehensiveness of the documentation. It requires consistency and comparability across the documentation of all datasets involved, and as such documentation must be treated as a user-centric product in and of itself. In this paper, we propose Data Cards for fostering transparent, purposeful and human-centered documentation of datasets within the practical contexts of industry and research. Data Cards are structured summaries of essential facts about various aspects of ML datasets needed by stakeholders across a dataset's lifecycle for responsible AI development. These summaries provide explanations of processes and rationales that shape the data and consequently the models, such as upstream sources, data collection and annotation methods; training and evaluation methods, intended use; or decisions affecting model performance. We also present frameworks that ground Data Cards in real-world utility and human-centricity. Using two case studies, we report on desirable characteristics that support adoption across domains, organizational structures, and audience groups. Finally, we present lessons learned from deploying over 20 Data Cards.

Key facts. Cited by 169 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2022.

Builds on

8 of 24 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  2. 2018The Open Images Dataset V4: Unified image classification, object detection, and visual relationship detection at scalecited by 542
  3. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  4. 2020Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertaintycited by 128
  5. 2021Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemscited by 124
  6. 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
  7. 2018FactSheets: Increasing Trust in AI Services through Supplier's Declarations of Conformitycited by 31
  8. 2021A framework for fostering transparency in shared artificial intelligence models by increasing visibility of contributionscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 14; 2023: 31; 2024: 50; 2025: 29; 2026: 45.

169 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
  2. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  3. 2022Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generationcited by 1,287
  4. 2023PaLM 2 Technical Reportcited by 1,154
  5. 2022PaLI: A Jointly-Scaled Multilingual Language-Image Modelcited by 762
  6. 2023EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understandingcited by 666
  7. 2024JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 494
  8. 2023SugarCrepe: Fixing Hackable Benchmarks for Vision-Language Compositionalitycited by 238
  9. 2024Aya Dataset: An Open-Access Collection for Multilingual Instruction Tuningcited by 174
  10. 2023Auditing large language models: a three-layered approachcited by 135
  11. 2024AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agentscited by 129
  12. 2024BetterBench: Assessing AI Benchmarks, Uncovering Issues, and Establishing Best Practicescited by 112
38 more
  1. 2024Benchmarking Benchmark Leakage in Large Language Modelscited by 102
  2. 2024Towards Conversational Diagnostic AIcited by 79
  3. 2023The Data Provenance Initiative: A Large Scale Audit of Dataset Licensing & Attribution in AIcited by 73
  4. 2023SeeGULL: A Stereotype Benchmark with Broad Geo-Cultural Coverage Leveraging Generative Modelscited by 66
  5. 2023ARB: Advanced Reasoning Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 60
  6. 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotationcited by 59
  7. 2023FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmarkcited by 58
  8. 2025Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Abovecited by 51
  9. 2024Dated Data: Tracing Knowledge Cutoffs in Large Language Modelscited by 48
  10. 2024Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commonscited by 45
  11. 2024DataDreamer: A Tool for Synthetic Data Generation and Reproducible LLM Workflowscited by 43
  12. 2023Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chainscited by 39
  13. 2023Analyzing Dataset Annotation Quality Management in the Wildcited by 39
  14. 2022GEMv2: Multilingual NLG Benchmarking in a Single Line of Codecited by 36
  15. 2024Reproducibility in Machine Learning-based Research: Overview, Barriers and Driverscited by 34
  16. 2023Charting the Sociotechnical Gap in Explainable AI: A Framework to Address the Gap in XAIcited by 33
  17. 2024Navigating Dataset Documentations in AI: A Large-Scale Analysis of Dataset Cards on Hugging Facecited by 27
  18. 2024Position: Measure Dataset Diversity, Don't Just Claim Itcited by 26
  19. 2023Leveraging LLMs for Synthesizing Training Data Across Many Languages in Multilingual Dense Retrievalcited by 24
  20. 2023Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairnesscited by 22
  21. 2024Dataset and Lessons Learned from the 2024 SaTML LLM Capture-the-Flag Competitioncited by 20
  22. 2025LLMail-Inject: A Dataset from a Realistic Adaptive Prompt Injection Challengecited by 20
  23. 2023Reproducibility in NLP: What Have We Learned from the Checklist?cited by 18
  24. 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
  25. 2023The Dataset Multiplicity Problem: How Unreliable Data Impacts Predictionscited by 17
  26. 2024Data Authenticity, Consent, & Provenance for AI are all broken: what will it take to fix them?cited by 15
  27. 2024From Transparency to Accountability and Back: A Discussion of Access and Evidence in AI Auditingcited by 15
  28. 2023Use case cards: a use case reporting framework inspired by the European AI Actcited by 14
  29. 2024The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: a systematic reviewcited by 13
  30. 2022A domain-specific language for describing machine learning datasetscited by 12
  31. 2022Saliency Cards: A Framework to Characterize and Compare Saliency Methodscited by 11
  32. 2023No Fair Lunch: A Causal Perspective on Dataset Bias in Machine Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 11
  33. 2024Value Imprint: A Technique for Auditing the Human Values Embedded in RLHF Datasetscited by 11
  34. 2024Data for Mathematical Copilots: Better Ways of Presenting Proofs for Machine Learningcited by 11
  35. 2024What's documented in AI? Systematic Analysis of 32K AI Model Cardscited by 10
  36. 2024Detectors for Safe and Reliable LLMs: Implementations, Uses, and Limitationscited by 10
  37. 2024The Future of Open Human Feedbackcited by 10
  38. 2024Benchmark Data Repositories for Better Benchmarkingcited by 10

50 most cited of 169 All 169 (JSON)