Reciprocal Collaboration: how lessons from convergence in GLAMs can enhance interdisciplinary AI research
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The need for collaboration between diverse fields of research is increasingly recognised as important by research funding agencies. A significant driver of this need is the current revolution in artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies. There is a growing interest in the potential impact of AI in different fields including the methodologies they use and the resulting advances in new knowledge, new access and enhanced productivity. However, there is also a corresponding increase in concern about the fundamentals of AI technologies and the way in which trans and/or interdisciplinary research is approached. The resulting collaboration too often ends up as a one-way street where the domain partner acts only as an information provider. For example, the contribution of the AHSS partner might be limited to providing insight about ethics and/or the technology partner may only provide a service to build applied AI-based solutions. In response to this problem, we propose a reciprocal approach to collaboration where both partners seek to understand, cooperate and identify jointly significant impacts. In this paper we explore this relationship between cultural heritage institutions (GLAMs), Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences (AHSS) research and technology-led AI research, especially the impact of current technological advances in AI. Drawing from the history of convergence in GLAM studies, we propose five key practices to form a framework for greater understanding across this divide.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2026.
Builds on
10 of 50 references.
References · 10
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
- 2019Lessons from Archives: Strategies for Collecting Sociocultural Data in Machine Learningcited by 116
- 2025Measurement to Meaning: A Validity-Centered Framework for AI Evaluationcited by 57
- 2024Training on the Benchmark Is Not All You Needcited by 25
- 2025Provocations from the Humanities for Generative AI Researchcited by 10
- 2026Computational Hermeneutics: Evaluating generative AI as a cultural technologycited by 8
- 2024The Power of Absence: Thinking with Archival Theory in Algorithmic Designcited by 5
- 2024Social Science Is Necessary for Operationalizing Socially Responsible Foundation Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.