mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Value Imprint: A Technique for Auditing the Human Values Embedded in RLHF Datasets

arXiv 2411.11937 ↗First posted 18 Nov 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 11

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Human values and AI feedback alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

LLMs are increasingly fine-tuned using RLHF datasets to align them with human preferences and values. However, very limited research has investigated which specific human values are operationalized through these datasets. In this paper, we introduce Value Imprint, a framework for auditing and classifying the human values embedded within RLHF datasets. To investigate the viability of this framework, we conducted three case study experiments by auditing the Anthropic/hh-rlhf, OpenAI WebGPT Comparisons, and Alpaca GPT-4-LLM datasets to examine the human values embedded within them. Our analysis involved a two-phase process. During the first phase, we developed a taxonomy of human values through an integrated review of prior works from philosophy, axiology, and ethics. Then, we applied this taxonomy to annotate 6,501 RLHF preferences. During the second phase, we employed the labels generated from the annotation as ground truth data for training a transformer-based machine learning model to audit and classify the three RLHF datasets. Through this approach, we discovered that information-utility values, including Wisdom/Knowledge and Information Seeking, were the most dominant human values within all three RLHF datasets. In contrast, prosocial and democratic values, including Well-being, Justice, and Human/Animal Rights, were the least represented human values. These findings have significant implications for developing language models that align with societal values and norms. We contribute our datasets to support further research in this area.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Human values and AI feedback alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 30 of its 151 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2024.

Builds on

30 of 151 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback15 Dec
  2. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Values5 Aug
  3. 2019Learning Norms from Stories: A Prior for Value Aligned Agents7 Dec

Other references · 27

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  3. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  5. 2021WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedbackcited by 1,722
  6. 2023Aligning Large Multimodal Models with Factually Augmented RLHFcited by 703
  7. 2023Instruction Tuning with GPT-4cited by 676
  8. 2021BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generationcited by 410
  9. 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
  10. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
  11. 2020Data and its (dis)contents: A survey of dataset development and use in machine learning researchcited by 259
  12. 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
15 more
  1. 2021Process for Adapting Language Models to Society (PALMS) with Values-Targeted Datasetscited by 179
  2. 2021The Values Encoded in Machine Learning Researchcited by 172
  3. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
  4. 2023Value Kaleidoscope: Engaging AI with Pluralistic Human Values, Rights, and Dutiescited by 97
  5. 2023Uncurated Image-Text Datasets: Shedding Light on Demographic Biascited by 51
  6. 2022Gender and Racial Bias in Visual Question Answering Datasetscited by 39
  7. 2022Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narrativescited by 32
  8. 2023Embedding Democratic Values into Social Media AIs via Societal Objective Functionscited by 25
  9. 2022Building Human Values into Recommender Systems: An Interdisciplinary Synthesiscited by 22
  10. 2022A Human Rights-Based Approach to Responsible AIcited by 20
  11. 2021A Framework for Deprecating Datasets: Standardizing Documentation, Identification, and Communicationcited by 18
  12. 2023Augmented Datasheets for Speech Datasets and Ethical Decision-Makingcited by 16
  13. 2020Reflexive Design for Fairness and Other Human Values in Formal Modelscited by 11
  14. 2022Making Intelligence: Ethical Values in IQ and ML Benchmarkscited by 10
  15. 2022Let's Talk About Socio-Technical Angst: Tracing the History and Evolution of Dark Patterns on Twitter from 2010-2021cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 7; 2026: 4.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ValueCompass: A Framework for Measuring Contextual Value Alignment Between Human and LLMs
  2. 2023Heterogeneous Value Alignment Evaluation for Large Language Models
  3. 2025Diverse Human Value Alignment for Large Language Models via Ethical Reasoning
  4. 2026RLHF May Not Reflect Genuine Preferences
  5. 2026Do LLMs Have Values? A Quantitative Analysis and Alignment Framework for Values in Large Language Models
  6. 2026Toward a Theory of Value in AI Alignment
  7. 2024SEAL: Systematic Error Analysis for Value ALignment
  8. 2026Geometry of Values: Task Vector Composition for Ethical Preference Alignment in Language Models