mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TS-Skill: A Benchmark for Evaluating Analytical Skills in Time-Series Question Answering

arXiv 2605.24703 ↗First posted 23 May 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) and time-series language models (TSLMs) are increasingly applied to time-series question answering (TSQA). Unlike text-only QA, TSQA requires models to ground answers in temporal signals whose patterns may occur at different scales, specific time locations, or across separated intervals. However, existing benchmarks are typically organized by task types or high-level reasoning categories, making it difficult to diagnose the underlying signal-level capabilities driving model performance. We introduce TS-Skill, a controlled benchmark for evaluating three composable analytical skills in TSQA: temporal scale selection (SK1), temporal localization (SK2), and cross-interval integration (SK3). TS-Skill provides timestamp-aware questions, broad domain coverage, and human-validated QA quality. To construct the benchmark at scale, we develop SKEvol, a skill-guided agentic framework that combines domain-aware time-series seed generation, skill-controlled question generation, metadata- and code-assisted answer construction, multi-phase signal-grounded verification, and human-in-the-loop curation. Experiments on ten state-of-the-art LLMs and TSLMs reveal substantial and uneven capability gaps across SK1-SK3. In particular, SK3 remains consistently challenging for non-agent models, whereas tool-augmented agents show a selective advantage on standalone SK3. These findings demonstrate that skill-level evaluation can uncover temporal reasoning failures that are obscured by aggregate TSQA scores.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 May 2026.

Builds on

26 of 43 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  6. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,125
  7. 2023Large Language Models Are Not Robust Multiple Choice Selectorscited by 486
  8. 2017TGIF-QA: Toward Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Visual Question Answeringcited by 378
  9. 2023Large Language Models Sensitivity to The Order of Options in Multiple-Choice Questionscited by 263
  10. 2022Leveraging Large Language Models for Multiple Choice Question Answeringcited by 203
  11. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
  12. 2022Deep Learning for Time Series Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 131
14 more
  1. 2021AGQA: A Benchmark for Compositional Spatio-Temporal Reasoningcited by 120
  2. 2024ChatTS: Aligning Time Series with LLMs via Synthetic Data for Enhanced Understanding and Reasoningcited by 103
  3. 2022Video Question Answering: Datasets, Algorithms and Challengescited by 84
  4. 2022Synthetic Data -- what, why and how?cited by 67
  5. 2025MTBench: A Multimodal Time Series Benchmark for Temporal Reasoning and Question Answeringcited by 55
  6. 2023ECG-QA: A Comprehensive Question Answering Dataset Combined With Electrocardiogramcited by 54
  7. 2025Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Abovecited by 52
  8. 2024Evaluating Large Language Models on Time Series Feature Understanding: A Comprehensive Taxonomy and Benchmarkcited by 38
  9. 2024Towards Time Series Reasoning with LLMscited by 37
  10. 2024Is Your Large Language Model Knowledgeable or a Choices-Only Cheater?cited by 12
  11. 2025TS-Reasoner: Aligning Time Series Foundation Models with LLM Reasoningcited by 12
  12. 2026TSAQA: Time Series Analysis Question And Answering Benchmarkcited by 11
  13. 2026MMTS-BENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Time Series Understanding and Reasoningcited by 9
  14. 2025QuAnTS: Question Answering on Time Seriescited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Time-MQA: Time Series Multi-Task Question Answering with Context Enhancement
  2. 2026T-SMART: Mechanism-Level Attribution for Tool-Augmented Time-Series Question Answering
  3. 2026Thoth: Mid-Training Bridges LLMs to Time Series Understanding
  4. 2025Chat-TS: Enhancing Multi-Modal Reasoning Over Time-Series and Natural Language Data
  5. 2026TS-Haystack: A Multi-Task Retrieval Benchmark for Long-Context Time-Series Reasoning
  6. 2026ARFBench: Benchmarking Time Series Question Answering Ability for Software Incident Response
  7. 2026Towards Verifiable Agentic Data Science: Solving Irregular TSQA Via Tool-Grounded Reasoning
  8. 2025TS-Agent: Understanding and Reasoning Over Raw Time Series via Iterative Insight Gathering