AuditRepairBench: A Paired-Execution Trace Corpus for Evaluator-Channel Ranking Instability in Agent Repair
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Agent-repair leaderboards reorder under evaluator reconfiguration, and a measurable share of the reordering is produced by methods that consult evaluator-derived signal during internal selection of candidate repairs. We document this failure mode on a public leaderboard and release AuditRepairBench, a paired-execution trace corpus of 576,000 registered cells (96,000 executed) that operationalizes evaluator-channel-blocking ranking instability within a declared observability boundary. A modular screening architecture decides pathway-blocking through four interchangeable implementations, a learned influence proxy, a rule-based channel-exposure ratio that uses no trained model, a counterfactual sensitivity proxy, and a sparse human-audit proxy, combined into a screening posterior that feeds a cell-level flip functional, a set-valued label, a stratified system score, and a set-valued leaderboard. The resource is supported by mechanism-anchored validation on an 80-case source-level channel-surgery subset, an independent-discovery protocol under which two annotator groups separated from the pipeline developers discover coupling patterns blinded to the screening design and the frozen ensemble attains pooled AUROC 0.83 on their 79 cases, implementation robustness, uncertainty propagation that raises 95% coverage from 0.81 to 0.95, and forward transfer with pooled community-evaluator Spearman rho = 0.65. Screening-guided blinding patches reduce rank displacement by 55--74% (mean 62%) at fewer than 50 lines of code, whereas random channel blinding produces at most 7% reduction and generic retraining at most 13%. AuditRepairBench-Lite, a rule-only configuration on a 12,000-cell subset, preserves the leaderboard at Kendall τ = 0.88 under twenty-four GPU-hours and is the primary release artifact at 42 GB.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
42 of 59 references.
References · 42
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2024LiveCodeBench: Holistic and Contamination Free Evaluation of Large Language Models for Codecited by 2,004
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,947
- 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,784
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
- 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,267
- 2022Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 smallcited by 1,165
- 2024OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agentscited by 1,002
30 more
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 897
- 2024LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own Generationscited by 686
- 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 546
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
- 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
- 2024AutoCodeRover: Autonomous Program Improvementcited by 278
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 249
- 2021Polyjuice: Generating Counterfactuals for Explaining, Evaluating, and Improving Modelscited by 222
- 2017A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalnesscited by 221
- 2021What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?cited by 203
- 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
- 2023Generative Judge for Evaluating Alignmentcited by 169
- 2025AgenTracer: Who Is Inducing Failure in the LLM Agentic Systems?cited by 116
- 2022Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instancescited by 111
- 2025Holistic Agent Leaderboard: The Missing Infrastructure for AI Agent Evaluationcited by 92
- 2024DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Modelscited by 76
- 2026Claw-Eval: Towards Trustworthy Evaluation of Autonomous Agentscited by 64
- 2024Commit0: Library Generation from Scratchcited by 52
- 2026BenchGuard: Who Guards the Benchmarks? Automated Auditing of LLM Agent Benchmarkscited by 15
- 2026Detecting Safety Violations Across Many Agent Tracescited by 14
- 2025Towards Effectively Leveraging Execution Traces for Program Repair with Code LLMscited by 11
- 2024RepairBench: Leaderboard of Frontier Models for Program Repaircited by 9
- 2025Dissecting the SWE-Bench Leaderboards: Profiling Submitters and Architectures of LLM- and Agent-Based Repair Systemscited by 8
- 2024Don't Label Twice: Quantity Beats Quality when Comparing Binary Classifiers on a Budgetcited by 7
- 2026AgentTrace: Causal Graph Tracing for Root Cause Analysis in Deployed Multi-Agent Systemscited by 7
- 2025Agentic Program Repair from Test Failures at Scale: A Neuro-symbolic approach with static analysis and test execution feedbackcited by 6
- 2026TraceCoder: A Trace-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for Automated Debugging of LLM-Generated Codecited by 6
- 2026From Guessing to Seeing: Enhancing LLM-Based Program Repair via Trace-Guided Multi-strategy Debatecited by 6
- 2026Agent Benchmarks Fail Public Sector Requirementscited by 3
- 2026Empowering Autonomous Debugging Agents with Efficient Dynamic Analysiscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.