mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Saliency Cards: A Framework to Characterize and Compare Saliency Methods

arXiv 2206.02958 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Saliency methods are a common class of machine learning interpretability techniques that calculate how important each input feature is to a model's output. We find that, with the rapid pace of development, users struggle to stay informed of the strengths and limitations of new methods and, thus, choose methods for unprincipled reasons (e.g., popularity). Moreover, despite a corresponding rise in evaluation metrics, existing approaches assume universal desiderata for saliency methods (e.g., faithfulness) that do not account for diverse user needs. In response, we introduce saliency cards: structured documentation of how saliency methods operate and their performance across a battery of evaluative metrics. Through a review of 25 saliency method papers and 33 method evaluations, we identify 10 attributes that users should account for when choosing a method. We group these attributes into three categories that span the process of computing and interpreting saliency: methodology, or how the saliency is calculated; sensitivity, or the relationship between the saliency and the underlying model and data; and, perceptibility, or how an end user ultimately interprets the result. By collating this information, saliency cards allow users to more holistically assess and compare the implications of different methods. Through nine semi-structured interviews with users from various backgrounds, including researchers, radiologists, and computational biologists, we find that saliency cards provide a detailed vocabulary for discussing individual methods and allow for a more systematic selection of task-appropriate methods. Moreover, with saliency cards, we are able to analyze the research landscape in a more structured fashion to identify opportunities for new methods and evaluation metrics for unmet user needs.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 91 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2022.

Builds on

59 of 91 references.

References · 59

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  6. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
  7. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  8. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  9. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  10. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  11. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,386
  12. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
38 more
  1. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  2. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,080
  3. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  4. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  5. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 838
  6. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  7. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 669
  8. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 612
  9. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 582
  10. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  11. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  12. 2018A Benchmark for Interpretability Methods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  13. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
  14. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 419
  15. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
  16. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 333
  17. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 321
  18. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
  19. 2019On the (In)fidelity and Sensitivity for Explanationscited by 310
  20. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 250
  21. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
  22. 2020Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Componentscited by 189
  23. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 171
  24. 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 159
  25. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  26. 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 135
  27. 2019Sanity Checks for Saliency Metricscited by 119
  28. 2019XRAI: Better Attributions Through Regionscited by 116
  29. 2019Benchmarking Attribution Methods with Relative Feature Importancecited by 89
  30. 2017Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttributioncited by 84
  31. 2021Beyond Expertise and Roles: A Framework to Characterize the Stakeholders of Interpretable Machine Learning and their Needscited by 64
  32. 2022Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentationcited by 61
  33. 2020Adv-watermark: A Novel Watermark Perturbation for Adversarial Examplescited by 56
  34. 2017Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 54
  35. 2021Towards Better Explanations of Class Activation Mappingcited by 47
  36. 2022The Road to Explainability is Paved with Bias: Measuring the Fairness of Explanationscited by 41
  37. 2022Metrics for saliency map evaluation of deep learning explanation methodscited by 40
  38. 2021Evaluating Saliency Methods for Neural Language Modelscited by 37

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

11 papers.