mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chains

arXiv 2304.14749 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2023cs.CY cs.AI cs.SIcited by 39

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Academic and policy proposals on algorithmic accountability often seek to understand algorithmic systems in their socio-technical context, recognising that they are produced by 'many hands'. Increasingly, however, algorithmic systems are also produced, deployed, and used within a supply chain comprising multiple actors tied together by flows of data between them. In such cases, it is the working together of an algorithmic supply chain of different actors who contribute to the production, deployment, use, and functionality that drives systems and produces particular outcomes. We argue that algorithmic accountability discussions must consider supply chains and the difficult implications they raise for the governance and accountability of algorithmic systems. In doing so, we explore algorithmic supply chains, locating them in their broader technical and political economic context and identifying some key features that should be understood in future work on algorithmic governance and accountability (particularly regarding general purpose AI services). To highlight ways forward and areas warranting attention, we further discuss some implications raised by supply chains: challenges for allocating accountability stemming from distributed responsibility for systems between actors, limited visibility due to the accountability horizon, service models of use and liability, and cross-border supply chains and regulatory arbitrage

Key facts. Cited by 39 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2023.

Builds on

15 of 104 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  2. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  3. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
  4. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 380
  5. 2022Data Cards: Purposeful and Transparent Dataset Documentation for Responsible AIcited by 169
  6. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  7. 2020Towards Accountability for Machine Learning Datasets: Practices from Software Engineering and Infrastructurecited by 138
  8. 2019Problem Formulation and Fairnesscited by 85
  9. 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 82
  10. 2022Interactive Model Cards: A Human-Centered Approach to Model Documentationcited by 61
  11. 2021Reviewable Automated Decision-Making: A Framework for Accountable Algorithmic Systemscited by 30
  12. 2021Outlining Traceability: A Principle for Operationalizing Accountability in Computing Systemscited by 26
3 more
  1. 2020Monitoring Misuse for Accountable 'Artificial Intelligence as a Service'cited by 6
  2. 2020Privacy Engineering Meets Software Engineering. On the Challenges of Engineering Privacy ByDesigncited by 3
  3. 2021Towards an accountable Internet of Things: A call for reviewabilitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 7; 2024: 7; 2025: 8; 2026: 17.

39 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024BioMedLM: A 2.7B Parameter Language Model Trained On Biomedical Textcited by 85
  2. 2025Position is Power: System Prompts as a Mechanism of Bias in Large Language Models (LLMs)cited by 19
  3. 2023Fine-Tuning Games: Bargaining and Adaptation for General-Purpose Modelscited by 17
  4. 2023Going public: the role of public participation approaches in commercial AI labscited by 11
  5. 2025HumanAgencyBench: Scalable Evaluation of Human Agency Support in AI Assistantscited by 10
  6. 2023Moderating Model Marketplaces: Platform Governance Puzzles for AI Intermediariescited by 9
  7. 2025What do Large Language Models Say About Animals? Investigating Risks of Animal Harm in Generated Textcited by 9
  8. 2025The 2025 Foundation Model Transparency Indexcited by 9
  9. 2025AI Supply Chains: An Emerging Ecosystem of AI Actors, Products, and Servicescited by 7
  10. 2024An Empirical Exploration of Trust Dynamics in LLM Supply Chainscited by 5
  11. 2024Law and the Emerging Political Economy of Algorithmic Auditscited by 5
  12. 2023The Ethics of AI Value Chainscited by 3
27 more
  1. 2023Unravelling Responsibility for AIcited by 3
  2. 2025Distinguishing Task-Specific and General-Purpose AI in Regulationcited by 3
  3. 2025Interpretability as Alignment: Making Internal Understanding a Design Principlecited by 3
  4. 2026Responsible Agentic AI Requires Explicit Provenancecited by 3
  5. 2024Self-sustaining Software Systems (S4): Towards Improved Interpretability and Adaptationcited by 2
  6. 2024Analysing and Organising Human Communications for AI Fairness-Related Decisions: Use Cases from the Public Sectorcited by 2
  7. 2023Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains: synthesis and emerging research questionscited by 1
  8. 2023What's my role? Modelling responsibility for AI-based safety-critical systemscited by 1
  9. 2025Openness in AI and downstream governance: A global value chain approachcited by 1
  10. 2026Human-Centred LLM Privacy Audits: Findings and Frictionscited by 1
  11. 2026"Is This Not Enough?": Asymmetries in Institutional Accountability and Collective Sensemaking in the Case of Canada's Algorithmic Visa Triage Systemcited by 1
  12. 2024From Stem to Stern: Contestability Along AI Value Chainscited by 0
  13. 2024Assistive AI for Augmenting Human Decision-makingcited by 0
  14. 2026The Limits of AI Data Transparency Policy: Three Disclosure Fallaciescited by 0
  15. 2026Bureaucratic Silences: What the Canadian AI Register Reveals, Omits, and Obscurescited by 0
  16. 2026How Supply Chain Dependencies Complicate Bias Measurement and Accountability Attribution in AI Hiring Applicationscited by 0
  17. 2026To Build or Not to Build? Factors that Lead to Non-Development or Abandonment of AI Systemscited by 0
  18. 2026Post-Deployment Accountability in AI Governance: A Cross-Regulatory Empirical Analysis of AI Incidentscited by 0
  19. 2026Some[Body] Must Receive That Pain for Agent Accountabilitycited by 0
  20. 2026Is Decentralized AI Governable? From Regulative Policy to Constitutive Protocolcited by 0
  21. 2026Can Data Work be Reparative?cited by 0
  22. 2026A Technical Typology of AI Systems in Public Administrationcited by 0
  23. 2026Security and Privacy in Agentic AI: Grand Challenges and Future Directionscited by 0
  24. 2026Unsafe at any AUC: Unlearned Lessons from Sociotechnical Disasters for Responsible AIcited by 0
  25. 2026The safety failures we are not instrumenting: a perspective on hidden safety-critical challenges in modern AI systemscited by 0
  26. 2026What We Know about Responsible AI Practices in Industry: A Half Decade of Empirical Researchcited by 0
  27. 2026The AI Accountability Ecosystem in the Era of Language Modelscited by 0