Morality is Non-Binary: Building a Pluralist Moral Sentence Embedding Space using Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in NLP show that language models retain a discernible level of knowledge in deontological ethics and moral norms. However, existing works often treat morality as binary, ranging from right to wrong. This simplistic view does not capture the nuances of moral judgment. Pluralist moral philosophers argue that human morality can be deconstructed into a finite number of elements, respecting individual differences in moral judgment. In line with this view, we build a pluralist moral sentence embedding space via a state-of-the-art contrastive learning approach. We systematically investigate the embedding space by studying the emergence of relationships among moral elements, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Our results show that a pluralist approach to morality can be captured in an embedding space. However, moral pluralism is challenging to deduce via self-supervision alone and requires a supervised approach with human labels.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2024.
Builds on
32 of 77 references.
References · 32
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
- 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
- 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
- 2020Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Normscited by 255
- 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
- 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 171
20 more
- 2021Can Machines Learn Morality? The Delphi Experimentcited by 141
- 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 130
- 2020Scruples: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32,000 Real-Life Anecdotescited by 101
- 2019ConveRT: Efficient and Accurate Conversational Representations from Transformerscited by 95
- 2022When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgmentcited by 93
- 2022ClarifyDelphi: Reinforced Clarification Questions with Defeasibility Rewards for Social and Moral Situationscited by 36
- 2022Is Neural Topic Modelling Better than Clustering? An Empirical Study on Clustering with Contextual Embeddings for Topicscited by 35
- 2022Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narrativescited by 32
- 2019MoralStrength: Exploiting a Moral Lexicon and Embedding Similarity for Moral Foundations Predictioncited by 31
- 2020Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?cited by 27
- 2017Acquiring Background Knowledge to Improve Moral Value Predictioncited by 22
- 2022The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed Argumentscited by 22
- 2020FrameAxis: Characterizing Microframe Bias and Intensity with Word Embeddingcited by 21
- 2023Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?cited by 15
- 2023Values, Ethics, Morals? On the Use of Moral Concepts in NLP Researchcited by 14
- 2021Reason Against the Machine: Future Directions for Mass Online Deliberationcited by 12
- 2022Learning to Adapt Domain Shifts of Moral Values via Instance Weightingcited by 11
- 2019Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Sentence Embeddingscited by 9
- 2022Label Anchored Contrastive Learning for Language Understandingcited by 7
- 2021Mapping Moral Valence of Tweets Following the Killing of George Floydcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024Evaluating Moral Beliefs across LLMs through a Pluralistic Frameworkcited by 11
- 2024Value Preferences Estimation and Disambiguation in Hybrid Participatory Systemscited by 7
- 2025A Game-Theoretic Negotiation Framework for Cross-Cultural Consensus in LLMscited by 2
- 2025Fairness Metric Design Exploration in Multi-Domain Moral Sentiment Classification using Transformer-Based Modelscited by 2
- 2024The Moral Foundations Weibo Corpuscited by 1
- 2025News is More than a Collection of Facts: Moral Frame Preserving News Summarizationcited by 1
- 2025Morality in AI. A plea to embed morality in LLM architectures and frameworkscited by 0
- 2025Morality in AI. A plea to embed morality in LLM architectures and frameworks21 Nov 2025
- 2025Fairness Metric Design Exploration in Multi-Domain Moral Sentiment Classification using Transformer-Based Models13 Oct 2025
- 2025A Game-Theoretic Negotiation Framework for Cross-Cultural Consensus in LLMs16 Jun 2025
- 2025News is More than a Collection of Facts: Moral Frame Preserving News Summarization1 Apr 2025
- 2024The Moral Foundations Weibo Corpus14 Nov 2024
- 2024Evaluating Moral Beliefs across LLMs through a Pluralistic Framework6 Nov 2024
- 2024Value Preferences Estimation and Disambiguation in Hybrid Participatory Systems26 Feb 2024