mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Morality is Non-Binary: Building a Pluralist Moral Sentence Embedding Space using Contrastive Learning

arXiv 2401.17228 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in NLP show that language models retain a discernible level of knowledge in deontological ethics and moral norms. However, existing works often treat morality as binary, ranging from right to wrong. This simplistic view does not capture the nuances of moral judgment. Pluralist moral philosophers argue that human morality can be deconstructed into a finite number of elements, respecting individual differences in moral judgment. In line with this view, we build a pluralist moral sentence embedding space via a state-of-the-art contrastive learning approach. We systematically investigate the embedding space by studying the emergence of relationships among moral elements, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Our results show that a pluralist approach to morality can be captured in an embedding space. However, moral pluralism is challenging to deduce via self-supervision alone and requires a supervised approach with human labels.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 77 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2024.

Builds on

32 of 77 references.

References · 32

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  3. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  4. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  6. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  7. 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
  8. 2020Artificial Intelligence, Values and Alignmentcited by 448
  9. 2020Keystroke Dynamics as Part of Lifeloggingcited by 334
  10. 2020Social Chemistry 101: Learning to Reason about Social and Moral Normscited by 255
  11. 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
  12. 2020Towards Debiasing Sentence Representationscited by 171
20 more
  1. 2021Can Machines Learn Morality? The Delphi Experimentcited by 141
  2. 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 130
  3. 2020Scruples: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32,000 Real-Life Anecdotescited by 101
  4. 2019ConveRT: Efficient and Accurate Conversational Representations from Transformerscited by 95
  5. 2022When to Make Exceptions: Exploring Language Models as Accounts of Human Moral Judgmentcited by 93
  6. 2022ClarifyDelphi: Reinforced Clarification Questions with Defeasibility Rewards for Social and Moral Situationscited by 36
  7. 2022Is Neural Topic Modelling Better than Clustering? An Empirical Study on Clustering with Contextual Embeddings for Topicscited by 35
  8. 2022Aligning to Social Norms and Values in Interactive Narrativescited by 32
  9. 2019MoralStrength: Exploiting a Moral Lexicon and Embedding Similarity for Moral Foundations Predictioncited by 31
  10. 2020Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?cited by 27
  11. 2017Acquiring Background Knowledge to Improve Moral Value Predictioncited by 22
  12. 2022The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed Argumentscited by 22
  13. 2020FrameAxis: Characterizing Microframe Bias and Intensity with Word Embeddingcited by 21
  14. 2023Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?cited by 15
  15. 2023Values, Ethics, Morals? On the Use of Moral Concepts in NLP Researchcited by 14
  16. 2021Reason Against the Machine: Future Directions for Mass Online Deliberationcited by 12
  17. 2022Learning to Adapt Domain Shifts of Moral Values via Instance Weightingcited by 11
  18. 2019Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Sentence Embeddingscited by 9
  19. 2022Label Anchored Contrastive Learning for Language Understandingcited by 7
  20. 2021Mapping Moral Valence of Tweets Following the Killing of George Floydcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.

7 papers.