mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bayesian Spectral Emotion Transition Discovery from Multi-Annotator Disagreement

arXiv 2606.01906 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Emotions evolve through the dynamics of conversation, and understanding their transition structure is foundational to applications ranging from mental-health screening to dialogue systems. However, existing studies typically compress multi-rater judgments into a single hard label by majority voting, discarding the uncertainty signal needed to understand turn-to-turn transitions. In this article, we propose Bayesian Spectral Emotion Transition Discovery (BSETD), a two-stage framework that discovers emotion-transition structure from multi-rater soft labels. In the first stage, a hierarchical Dirichlet-Multinomial posterior is constructed through the outer product of soft labels, equipping each cell of the K x K transition matrix with a credible interval and Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) false discovery rate (FDR)-controlled significance. In the second stage, the symmetrized graph Laplacian is spectrally decomposed to separate a low-frequency (inertia) component from a high-frequency (contagion) component. On EmotionLines, BSETD simultaneously recovers the signatures of two distinct affective spaces: the Plutchik-adjacent transitions disgust to anger (log2 lift +0.94) and anger to disgust (+0.86) are over-represented, while the Russell-valence-reversed transitions joy to anger (-0.90) and anger to joy (-0.89) are under-represented. A five-source cross-corpus validation yields pairwise Pearson correlations in 0.91-0.98 within English, 0.79-0.85 against Chinese M3ED, and 0.979 between the human hard labels and the LLM virtual soft labels on the same utterance set, demonstrating that a pipeline preserving annotator uncertainty bridges the computational study of emotion dynamics with established psychological theory.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 26 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Datasetcited by 649
  2. 2018MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversationscited by 636
  3. 2018DialogueRNN: An Attentive RNN for Emotion Detection in Conversationscited by 216
  4. 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 129
  5. 2018EmotionLines: An Emotion Corpus of Multi-Party Conversationscited by 80
  6. 2024Revisiting Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation from the Perspective of Graph Spectrumcited by 33
  7. 2022Knowledge-Bridged Causal Interaction Network for Causal Emotion Entailmentcited by 16
  8. 2024Tracing Intricate Cues in Dialogue: Joint Graph Structure and Sentiment Dynamics for Multimodal Emotion Recognitioncited by 8
  9. 2025LeWiDi-2025 at NLPerspectives: Third Edition of the Learning with Disagreements Shared Taskcited by 8
  10. 2023EmotionIC: emotional inertia and contagion-driven dependency modeling for emotion recognition in conversationcited by 7
  11. 2026LLMs Capture Emotion Labels, Not Emotion Uncertainty: Distributional Analysis and Calibration of Human-LLM Judgment Gapscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.