mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do Differences in Values Influence Disagreements in Online Discussions?

arXiv 2310.15757 ↗First posted 24 Oct 2023cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Disagreements are common in online discussions. Disagreement may foster collaboration and improve the quality of a discussion under some conditions. Although there exist methods for recognizing disagreement, a deeper understanding of factors that influence disagreement is lacking in the literature. We investigate a hypothesis that differences in personal values are indicative of disagreement in online discussions. We show how state-of-the-art models can be used for estimating values in online discussions and how the estimated values can be aggregated into value profiles. We evaluate the estimated value profiles based on human-annotated agreement labels. We find that the dissimilarity of value profiles correlates with disagreement in specific cases. We also find that including value information in agreement prediction improves performance.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Oct 2023.

Builds on

24 of 86 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 876
  4. 2019Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoderscited by 556
  5. 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 130
  6. 2020Scruples: A Corpus of Community Ethical Judgments on 32,000 Real-Life Anecdotescited by 101
  7. 2020Zero-Shot Stance Detection: A Dataset and Model using Generalized Topic Representationscited by 98
  8. 2020Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trendscited by 95
  9. 2019Seeing Things from a Different Angle: Discovering Diverse Perspectives about Claimscited by 74
  10. 2020We Need to Talk About Random Splitscited by 71
  11. 2021ValueNet: A New Dataset for Human Value Driven Dialogue Systemcited by 34
  12. 2021Cross-Domain Label-Adaptive Stance Detectioncited by 30
12 more
  1. 2022The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed Argumentscited by 22
  2. 2021I Beg to Differ: A study of constructive disagreement in online conversationscited by 18
  3. 2016Conversational Markers of Constructive Discussionscited by 17
  4. 2021Reason Against the Machine: Future Directions for Mass Online Deliberationcited by 12
  5. 2019Not All Claims are Created Equal: Choosing the Right Statistical Approach to Assess Hypothesescited by 8
  6. 2022Will It Blend? Mixing Training Paradigms & Prompting for Argument Quality Predictioncited by 7
  7. 2021"Laughing at you or with you": The Role of Sarcasm in Shaping the Disagreement Spacecited by 5
  8. 2021Perspective-taking to Reduce Affective Polarization on Social Mediacited by 5
  9. 2023Improving (Dis)agreement Detection with Inductive Social Relation Information From Comment-Reply Interactionscited by 5
  10. 2020On Predicting Personal Values of Social Media Users using Community-Specific Language Features and Personal Value Correlationcited by 4
  11. 2022From Hesitancy Framings to Vaccine Hesitancy Profiles: A Journey of Stance, Ontological Commitments and Moral Foundationscited by 4
  12. 2020A First Look at Human Values-Violation in App Reviewscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 6.

15 papers.

Sort: