AustroTox: A Dataset for Target-Based Austrian German Offensive Language Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model interpretability in toxicity detection greatly profits from token-level annotations. However, currently such annotations are only available in English. We introduce a dataset annotated for offensive language detection sourced from a news forum, notable for its incorporation of the Austrian German dialect, comprising 4,562 user comments. In addition to binary offensiveness classification, we identify spans within each comment constituting vulgar language or representing targets of offensive statements. We evaluate fine-tuned language models as well as large language models in a zero- and few-shot fashion. The results indicate that while fine-tuned models excel in detecting linguistic peculiarities such as vulgar dialect, large language models demonstrate superior performance in detecting offensiveness in AustroTox. We publish the data and code.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2024.
Builds on
13 of 41 references.
References · 13
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
- 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 377
- 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
- 2020German's Next Language Modelcited by 144
- 2021MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document contextcited by 140
- 2021Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computingcited by 129
- 2017Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisiscited by 95
- 2022Multilingual HateCheck: Functional Tests for Multilingual Hate Speech Detection Modelscited by 51
- 2023Personalizing Content Moderation on Social Media: User Perspectives on Moderation Choices, Interface Design, and Laborcited by 16
- 2024Improving Adversarial Data Collection by Supporting Annotators: Lessons from GAHD, a German Hate Speech Datasetcited by 13
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Automatic Online Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languagescited by 2
- 2026Bye Bye Perspective API: Lessons for Building and Governing Measurement Infrastructurecited by 1
- 2025Context-Aware Content Moderation for German Newspaper Commentscited by 0
- 2025From Ground Trust to Truth: Disparities in Offensive Language Judgments on Contemporary Korean Political Discoursecited by 0
- 2026Bye Bye Perspective API: Lessons for Building and Governing Measurement Infrastructure28 Apr 2026
- 2025From Ground Trust to Truth: Disparities in Offensive Language Judgments on Contemporary Korean Political Discourse18 Sep 2025
- 2025Context-Aware Content Moderation for German Newspaper Comments27 May 2025
- 2024A Survey on Automatic Online Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages28 Nov 2024