mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fully Test-Time Adaptation for Monocular 3D Object Detection

arXiv 2405.19682 ↗First posted 30 May 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Monocular 3D object detection (Mono 3Det) aims to identify 3D objects from a single RGB image. However, existing methods often assume training and test data follow the same distribution, which may not hold in real-world test scenarios. To address the out-of-distribution (OOD) problems, we explore a new adaptation paradigm for Mono 3Det, termed Fully Test-time Adaptation. It aims to adapt a well-trained model to unlabeled test data by handling potential data distribution shifts at test time without access to training data and test labels. However, applying this paradigm in Mono 3Det poses significant challenges due to OOD test data causing a remarkable decline in object detection scores. This decline conflicts with the pre-defined score thresholds of existing detection methods, leading to severe object omissions (i.e., rare positive detections and many false negatives). Consequently, the limited positive detection and plenty of noisy predictions cause test-time adaptation to fail in Mono 3Det. To handle this problem, we propose a novel Monocular Test-Time Adaptation (MonoTTA) method, based on two new strategies. 1) Reliability-driven adaptation: we empirically find that high-score objects are still reliable and the optimization of high-score objects can enhance confidence across all detections. Thus, we devise a self-adaptive strategy to identify reliable objects for model adaptation, which discovers potential objects and alleviates omissions. 2) Noise-guard adaptation: since high-score objects may be scarce, we develop a negative regularization term to exploit the numerous low-score objects via negative learning, preventing overfitting to noise and trivial solutions. Experimental results show that MonoTTA brings significant performance gains for Mono 3Det models in OOD test scenarios, approximately 190% gains by average on KITTI and 198% gains on nuScenes.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2024.

Builds on

41 of 51 references.

References · 41

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  4. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  5. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
  6. 2022BEVFusion: Multi-Task Multi-Sensor Fusion with Unified Bird's-Eye View Representationcited by 844
  7. 2019CenterNet: Keypoint Triplets for Object Detectioncited by 654
  8. 2022Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 467
  9. 2018Pseudo-LiDAR from Visual Depth Estimation: Bridging the Gap in 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 455
  10. 2017Deep Layer Aggregationcited by 436
  11. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 427
  12. 2023Towards Stable Test-Time Adaptation in Dynamic Wild Worldcited by 409
29 more
  1. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 376
  2. 2021Categorical Depth Distribution Network for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 326
  3. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 235
  4. 2023VoxelNeXt: Fully Sparse VoxelNet for 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 221
  5. 2020SMOKE: Single-Stage Monocular 3D Object Detection via Keypoint Estimationcited by 202
  6. 2021Objects are Different: Flexible Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 184
  7. 2019Learning Depth-Guided Convolutions for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 169
  8. 2019Stereo R-CNN based 3D Object Detection for Autonomous Drivingcited by 163
  9. 2021ST3D: Self-training for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on 3D Object Detectioncited by 158
  10. 2020MonoPair: Monocular 3D Object Detection Using Pairwise Spatial Relationshipscited by 153
  11. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  12. 2021Source-free Domain Adaptation via Avatar Prototype Generation and Adaptationcited by 111
  13. 2020Rethinking Pseudo-LiDAR Representationcited by 109
  14. 2023Virtual Sparse Convolution for Multimodal 3D Object Detectioncited by 81
  15. 2022Rope3D: TheRoadside Perception Dataset for Autonomous Driving and Monocular 3D Object Detection Taskcited by 79
  16. 2024Test-Time Model Adaptation with Only Forward Passescited by 74
  17. 2021GrooMeD-NMS: Grouped Mathematically Differentiable NMS for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 66
  18. 2020Collaborative Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Diagnosiscited by 60
  19. 2023LATR: 3D Lane Detection from Monocular Images with Transformercited by 44
  20. 2021Spectral Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Visual Recognitioncited by 40
  21. 2022MonoGround: Detecting Monocular 3D Objects from the Groundcited by 37
  22. 2021Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 34
  23. 2021The Devil is in the Task: Exploiting Reciprocal Appearance-Localization Features for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 34
  24. 2022Prototype-Guided Continual Adaptation for Class-Incremental Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 33
  25. 2023MonoNeRD: NeRF-like Representations for Monocular 3D Object Detectioncited by 33
  26. 2021Test time Adaptation through Perturbation Robustnesscited by 28
  27. 2023Towards Domain Generalization for Multi-view 3D Object Detection in Bird-Eye-Viewcited by 27
  28. 2022Ev-TTA: Test-Time Adaptation for Event-Based Object Recognitioncited by 26
  29. 2022Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Monocular 3D Object Detection via Self-Trainingcited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.