Dirichlet-Based Prediction Calibration for Learning with Noisy Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning with noisy labels can significantly hinder the generalization performance of deep neural networks (DNNs). Existing approaches address this issue through loss correction or example selection methods. However, these methods often rely on the model's predictions obtained from the softmax function, which can be over-confident and unreliable. In this study, we identify the translation invariance of the softmax function as the underlying cause of this problem and propose the textitDirichlet-based Prediction Calibration (DPC) method as a solution. Our method introduces a calibrated softmax function that breaks the translation invariance by incorporating a suitable constant in the exponent term, enabling more reliable model predictions. To ensure stable model training, we leverage a Dirichlet distribution to assign probabilities to predicted labels and introduce a novel evidence deep learning (EDL) loss. The proposed loss function encourages positive and sufficiently large logits for the given label, while penalizing negative and small logits for other labels, leading to more distinct logits and facilitating better example selection based on a large-margin criterion. Through extensive experiments on diverse benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that DPC achieves state-of-the-art performance. The code is available at https://github.com/chenchenzong/DPC.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2024.
Builds on
30 of 44 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
- 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 994
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 691
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
- 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
18 more
- 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 414
- 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
- 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
- 2017WebVision Database: Visual Learning and Understanding from Web Datacited by 262
- 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
- 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
- 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
- 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
- 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
- 2018Dimensionality-Driven Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 173
- 2020Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approachcited by 158
- 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
- 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
- 2022Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterizationcited by 93
- 2020Multi-Objective Interpolation Training for Robustness to Label Noisecited by 86
- 2021Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 34
- 2023Dirichlet-based Uncertainty Calibration for Active Domain Adaptationcited by 23
- 2022Noise-Robust Bidirectional Learning with Dynamic Sample Reweightingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Bidirectional Uncertainty-Based Active Learning for Open Set Annotationcited by 7
- 2025Rethinking Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty for Active Open-Set Annotation: An Energy-Based Approachcited by 5
- 2025Sample Selection via Contrastive Fragmentation for Noisy Label Regressioncited by 4
- 2025Label Calibration in Source Free Domain Adaptationcited by 3
- 2024Understanding and Mitigating the Bias in Sample Selection for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 1
- 2026From Calibration to Refinement: Seeking Certainty via Probabilistic Evidence Propagation for Noisy-Label Person Re-Identificationcited by 0
- 2026Revisiting Unknowns: Towards Effective and Efficient Open-Set Active Learningcited by 0
- 2026Revisiting Unknowns: Towards Effective and Efficient Open-Set Active Learning9 Mar 2026
- 2026From Calibration to Refinement: Seeking Certainty via Probabilistic Evidence Propagation for Noisy-Label Person Re-Identification26 Feb 2026
- 2025Rethinking Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty for Active Open-Set Annotation: An Energy-Based Approach27 Feb 2025
- 2025Sample Selection via Contrastive Fragmentation for Noisy Label Regression25 Feb 2025
- 2025Label Calibration in Source Free Domain Adaptation13 Jan 2025
- 2024Bidirectional Uncertainty-Based Active Learning for Open Set Annotation23 Feb 2024
- 2024Understanding and Mitigating the Bias in Sample Selection for Learning with Noisy Labels24 Jan 2024