mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PARS: Pseudo-Label Aware Robust Sample Selection for Learning with Noisy Labels

arXiv 2201.10836 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2022cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Acquiring accurate labels on large-scale datasets is both time consuming and expensive. To reduce the dependency of deep learning models on learning from clean labeled data, several recent research efforts are focused on learning with noisy labels. These methods typically fall into three design categories to learn a noise robust model: sample selection approaches, noise robust loss functions, or label correction methods. In this paper, we propose PARS: Pseudo-Label Aware Robust Sample Selection, a hybrid approach that combines the best from all three worlds in a joint-training framework to achieve robustness to noisy labels. Specifically, PARS exploits all training samples using both the raw/noisy labels and estimated/refurbished pseudo-labels via self-training, divides samples into an ambiguous and a noisy subset via loss analysis, and designs label-dependent noise-aware loss functions for both sets of filtered labels. Results show that PARS significantly outperforms the state of the art on extensive studies on the noisy CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets, particularly on challenging high-noise and low-resource settings. In particular, PARS achieved an absolute 12% improvement in test accuracy on the CIFAR-100 dataset with 90% symmetric label noise, and an absolute 27% improvement in test accuracy when only 1/5 of the noisy labels are available during training as an additional restriction. On a real-world noisy dataset, Clothing1M, PARS achieves competitive results to the state of the art.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2022.

Builds on

38 of 51 references.

References · 38

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  6. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  7. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  8. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  9. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  10. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  11. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
  12. 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,362
26 more
  1. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  2. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  3. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  4. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  5. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  6. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  7. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 510
  8. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  9. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  10. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
  11. 2019How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?cited by 390
  12. 2019ReMixMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Distribution Alignment and Augmentation Anchoringcited by 349
  13. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  14. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  15. 2018Joint Optimization Framework for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 293
  16. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  17. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  18. 2019Probabilistic End-to-end Noise Correction for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 210
  19. 2019Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?cited by 208
  20. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
  21. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  22. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
  23. 2019Deep Self-Learning From Noisy Labelscited by 122
  24. 2021Augmentation Strategies for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 86
  25. 2021Joint Negative and Positive Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 34
  26. 2019IMAE for Noise-Robust Learning: Mean Absolute Error Does Not Treat Examples Equally and Gradient Magnitude's Variance Matterscited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.