mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Combinatorial Bandits under Strategic Manipulations

arXiv 2102.12722 ↗First posted 25 Feb 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Strategic behavior against sequential learning methods, such as "click framing" in real recommendation systems, have been widely observed. Motivated by such behavior we study the problem of combinatorial multi-armed bandits (CMAB) under strategic manipulations of rewards, where each arm can modify the emitted reward signals for its own interest. This characterization of the adversarial behavior is a relaxation of previously well-studied settings such as adversarial attacks and adversarial corruption. We propose a strategic variant of the combinatorial UCB algorithm, which has a regret of at most O(mlog T + m Bmax) under strategic manipulations, where T is the time horizon, m is the number of arms, and Bmax is the maximum budget of an arm. We provide lower bounds on the budget for arms to incur certain regret of the bandit algorithm. Extensive experiments on online worker selection for crowdsourcing systems, online influence maximization and online recommendations with both synthetic and real datasets corroborate our theoretical findings on robustness and regret bounds, in a variety of regimes of manipulation budgets.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Feb 2021.

Builds on

24 of 52 references.

References · 24

  1. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
  2. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  3. 2019Better Algorithms for Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 91
  4. 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
  5. 2020Stochastic Linear Bandits Robust to Adversarial Attackscited by 65
  6. 2018Adversarial Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 56
  7. 2019Beating Stochastic and Adversarial Semi-bandits Optimally and Simultaneouslycited by 53
  8. 2019Data Poisoning Attacks on Stochastic Banditscited by 52
  9. 2020PAC-Learning for Strategic Classificationcited by 50
  10. 2020The Strategic Perceptroncited by 48
  11. 2017Resilience: A Criterion for Learning in the Presence of Arbitrary Outlierscited by 43
  12. 2019Improved Algorithm on Online Clustering of Banditscited by 38
12 more
  1. 2020Adversarial Attacks on Linear Contextual Banditscited by 34
  2. 2014Influence Maximization: Near-Optimal Time Complexity Meets Practical Efficiencycited by 33
  3. 2019Top-k Combinatorial Bandits with Full-Bandit Feedbackcited by 28
  4. 2017Combinatorial Semi-Bandits with Knapsackscited by 23
  5. 2018Best Arm Identification for Contaminated Banditscited by 23
  6. 2020Online Influence Maximization under Linear Threshold Modelcited by 17
  7. 2017Multi-armed Bandit Problems with Strategic Armscited by 16
  8. 2019The Intrinsic Robustness of Stochastic Bandits to Strategic Manipulationcited by 15
  9. 2021Adversarial Combinatorial Bandits with General Non-linear Reward Functionscited by 14
  10. 2019Stochastic Online Learning with Probabilistic Graph Feedbackcited by 12
  11. 2013Linear Regression from Strategic Data Sourcescited by 6
  12. 2019Combining Crowd and Machines for Multi-predicate Item Screeningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

6 papers.