mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracy

arXiv 2002.00065 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2020cs.CVcited by 47

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a comprehensive analysis of how and why face recognition accuracy differs between men and women. We show that accuracy is lower for women due to the combination of (1) the impostor distribution for women having a skew toward higher similarity scores, and (2) the genuine distribution for women having a skew toward lower similarity scores. We show that this phenomenon of the impostor and genuine distributions for women shifting closer towards each other is general across datasets of African-American, Caucasian, and Asian faces. We show that the distribution of facial expressions may differ between male/female, but that the accuracy difference persists for image subsets rated confidently as neutral expression. The accuracy difference also persists for image subsets rated as close to zero pitch angle. Even when removing images with forehead partially occluded by hair/hat, the same impostor/genuine accuracy difference persists. We show that the female genuine distribution improves when only female images without facial cosmetics are used, but that the female impostor distribution also degrades at the same time. Lastly, we show that the accuracy difference persists even if a state-of-the-art deep learning method is trained from scratch using training data explicitly balanced between male and female images and subjects.

Key facts. Cited by 47 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 11; 2022: 11; 2023: 9; 2024: 7; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

47 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: the Casual Conversations Datasetcited by 80
  2. 2021Towards Fair Federated Learning with Zero-Shot Data Augmentationcited by 64
  3. 2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifierscited by 53
  4. 2022Discover and Mitigate Unknown Biases with Debiasing Alternate Networkscited by 47
  5. 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
  6. 2021Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphologycited by 32
  7. 2024AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmarkcited by 28
  8. 2021Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasetscited by 22
  9. 2021Anatomizing Bias in Facial Analysiscited by 18
  10. 2021Balancing Biases and Preserving Privacy on Balanced Faces in the Wildcited by 17
  11. 2022The Gender Gap in Face Recognition Accuracy Is a Hairy Problemcited by 15
  12. 2022Fairness in Face Presentation Attack Detectioncited by 13
35 more
  1. 2023What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?cited by 13
  2. 2022A Deep Dive into Dataset Imbalance and Bias in Face Identificationcited by 11
  3. 2021Going Deeper Into Face Detection: A Surveycited by 10
  4. 2022Are Two Heads the Same as One? Identifying Disparate Treatment in Fair Neural Networkscited by 10
  5. 2022VisCUIT: Visual Auditor for Bias in CNN Image Classifiercited by 8
  6. 2025Review of Demographic Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 7
  7. 2021Distill and De-bias: Mitigating Bias in Face Verification using Knowledge Distillationcited by 6
  8. 2022Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristicscited by 6
  9. 2022Casual Conversations v2: Designing a large consent-driven dataset to measure algorithmic bias and robustnesscited by 5
  10. 2023Impact of Blur and Resolution on Demographic Disparities in 1-to-Many Facial Identificationcited by 5
  11. 2021Does Face Recognition Error Echo Gender Classification Error?cited by 4
  12. 2023The Casual Conversations v2 Datasetcited by 4
  13. 2024Score Normalization for Demographic Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 4
  14. 2024FineFACE: Fair Facial Attribute Classification Leveraging Fine-grained Featurescited by 3
  15. 2024The Impact of Balancing Real and Synthetic Data on Accuracy and Fairness in Face Recognitioncited by 3
  16. 2022The More Secure, The Less Equally Usable: Gender and Ethnicity (Un)fairness of Deep Face Recognition along Security Thresholdscited by 2
  17. 2024A Self-Supervised Learning Pipeline for Demographically Fair Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 2
  18. 2024CounterFace: A Synthetic Face Dataset for Fine-Grained Counterfactual Evaluation of Face Recognition Systemscited by 2
  19. 2025On the Illusion of Gender Bias in Face Recognition: Explaining the Fairness Issue Through Non-demographic Attributescited by 2
  20. 2021Demographic Fairness in Face Identification: The Watchlist Imbalance Effectcited by 1
  21. 2022Is Facial Recognition Biased at Near-Infrared Spectrum As Well?cited by 1
  22. 2023Linking convolutional kernel size to generalization bias in face analysis CNNscited by 1
  23. 2023Exploring Causes of Demographic Variations In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 1
  24. 2023(Un)fair Exposure in Deep Face Rankings at a Distancecited by 1
  25. 2023GELDA: A generative language annotation framework to reveal visual biases in datasetscited by 1
  26. 2025A Rapid Test for Accuracy and Bias of Face Recognition Technologycited by 1
  27. 2025Vec2Face+ for Face Dataset Generationcited by 1
  28. 2023Analysis of Recent Trends in Face Recognition Systemscited by 0
  29. 2023Multi-Focus Image Fusion Based on Spatial Frequency(SF) and Consistency Verification(CV) in DCT Domaincited by 0
  30. 2024Testing the Performance of Face Recognition for People with Down Syndromecited by 0
  31. 2025Reliable and Reproducible Demographic Inference for Fairness in Face Analysiscited by 0
  32. 2025Mitigating Bias with Words: Inducing Demographic Ambiguity in Face Recognition Templates by Text Encodingcited by 0
  33. 2025Leveraging Text Guidance for Enhancing Demographic Fairness in Gender Classificationcited by 0
  34. 2026Auditing Demographic Bias in Facial Landmark Detection for Fair Human-Robot Interactioncited by 0
  35. 2026Bias Mitigation in Face Recognition via Demographic-based Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 0