mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The More Secure, The Less Equally Usable: Gender and Ethnicity (Un)fairness of Deep Face Recognition along Security Thresholds

arXiv 2209.15550 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face biometrics are playing a key role in making modern smart city applications more secure and usable. Commonly, the recognition threshold of a face recognition system is adjusted based on the degree of security for the considered use case. The likelihood of a match can be for instance decreased by setting a high threshold in case of a payment transaction verification. Prior work in face recognition has unfortunately showed that error rates are usually higher for certain demographic groups. These disparities have hence brought into question the fairness of systems empowered with face biometrics. In this paper, we investigate the extent to which disparities among demographic groups change under different security levels. Our analysis includes ten face recognition models, three security thresholds, and six demographic groups based on gender and ethnicity. Experiments show that the higher the security of the system is, the higher the disparities in usability among demographic groups are. Compelling unfairness issues hence exist and urge countermeasures in real-world high-stakes environments requiring severe security levels.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2022.

Builds on

15 of 21 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,417
  3. 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 520
  4. 2020ResNeSt: Split-Attention Networkscited by 445
  5. 2017Residual Attention Network for Image Classificationcited by 385
  6. 2021A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographicscited by 86
  7. 2022Meta Balanced Network for Fair Face Recognitioncited by 53
  8. 2021FaceX-Zoo: A PyTorch Toolbox for Face Recognitioncited by 49
  9. 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
  10. 2020FairFace Challenge at ECCV 2020: Analyzing Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 26
  11. 2020Is Face Recognition Sexist? No, Gendered Hairstyles and Biology Arecited by 23
  12. 2021Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasetscited by 22
3 more
  1. 2021Unravelling the Effect of Image Distortions for Biased Prediction of Pre-trained Face Recognition Modelscited by 11
  2. 2020NPCFace: Negative-Positive Collaborative Training for Large-scale Face Recognitioncited by 9
  3. 2022Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristicscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.