Does Face Recognition Error Echo Gender Classification Error?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper is the first to explore the question of whether images that are classified incorrectly by a face analytics algorithm (e.g., gender classification) are any more or less likely to participate in an image pair that results in a face recognition error. We analyze results from three different gender classification algorithms (one open-source and two commercial), and two face recognition algorithms (one open-source and one commercial), on image sets representing four demographic groups (African-American female and male, Caucasian female and male). For impostor image pairs, our results show that pairs in which one image has a gender classification error have a better impostor distribution than pairs in which both images have correct gender classification, and so are less likely to generate a false match error. For genuine image pairs, our results show that individuals whose images have a mix of correct and incorrect gender classification have a worse genuine distribution (increased false non-match rate) compared to individuals whose images all have correct gender classification. Thus, compared to images that generate correct gender classification, images that generate gender classification errors do generate a different pattern of recognition errors, both better (false match) and worse (false non-match).
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2021.
Builds on
16 of 40 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
- 2015YFCC100M: The New Data in Multimedia Researchcited by 234
- 2019RetinaFace: Single-stage Dense Face Localisation in the Wildcited by 164
- 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
- 2019Diversity in Facescited by 77
- 2020img2pose: Face Alignment and Detection via 6DoF, Face Pose Estimationcited by 57
- 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
- 2019Characterizing the Variability in Face Recognition Accuracy Relative to Racecited by 40
- 2020How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?cited by 37
- 2018An Experimental Evaluation of Covariates Effects on Unconstrained Face Verificationcited by 28
4 more
- 2018Understanding Unequal Gender Classification Accuracy from Face Imagescited by 25
- 2020Is Face Recognition Sexist? No, Gendered Hairstyles and Biology Arecited by 23
- 2019Does Face Recognition Accuracy Get Better With Age? Deep Face Matchers Say Nocited by 16
- 2017Quantifying Facial Age by Posterior of Age Comparisonscited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
4 papers.