A Rapid Test for Accuracy and Bias of Face Recognition Technology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Measuring the accuracy of face recognition (FR) systems is essential for improving performance and ensuring responsible use. Accuracy is typically estimated using large annotated datasets, which are costly and difficult to obtain. We propose a novel method for 1:1 face verification that benchmarks FR systems quickly and without manual annotation, starting from approximate labels (e.g., from web search results). Unlike previous methods for training set label cleaning, ours leverages the embedding representation of the models being evaluated, achieving high accuracy in smaller-sized test datasets. Our approach reliably estimates FR accuracy and ranking, significantly reducing the time and cost of manual labeling. We also introduce the first public benchmark of five FR cloud services, revealing demographic biases, particularly lower accuracy for Asian women. Our rapid test method can democratize FR testing, promoting scrutiny and responsible use of the technology. Our method is provided as a publicly accessible tool at https://github.com/caltechvisionlab/frt-rapid-test
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2025.
Builds on
14 of 46 references.
References · 14
- 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
- 2017SphereFace: Deep Hypersphere Embedding for Face Recognitioncited by 737
- 2020Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithmscited by 64
- 2019Discrimination in the Age of Algorithmscited by 51
- 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
- 2022WebFace260M: A Benchmark for Million-Scale Deep Face Recognitioncited by 42
- 2021Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphologycited by 32
- 2020Can I Trust My Fairness Metric? Assessing Fairness with Unlabeled Data and Bayesian Inferencecited by 31
- 2023Benchmarking Algorithmic Bias in Face Recognition: An Experimental Approach Using Synthetic Faces and Human Evaluationcited by 25
- 2019Does Face Recognition Accuracy Get Better With Age? Deep Face Matchers Say Nocited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.