mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Illusion of Gender Bias in Face Recognition: Explaining the Fairness Issue Through Non-demographic Attributes

arXiv 2501.12020 ↗First posted 21 Jan 2025cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face recognition systems (FRS) exhibit significant accuracy differences based on the user's gender. Since such a gender gap reduces the trustworthiness of FRS, more recent efforts have tried to find the causes. However, these studies make use of manually selected, correlated, and small-sized sets of facial features to support their claims. In this work, we analyze gender bias in face recognition by successfully extending the search domain to decorrelated combinations of 40 non-demographic facial characteristics. First, we introduce a toolchain to effectively decorrelate and aggregate facial attributes to enable a less-biased gender analysis on large-scale data. Second, we tailor two specialized metrics to quantify the effect of facial attributes on absolute and relative fairness. Based on these grounds, we thirdly present a novel unsupervised joint investigation framework capable of identifying attribute combinations leading to vanishing bias when used as filter predicates for balanced testing datasets. Experiments show the gender gap vanishing when images of male and female subjects share specific attributes, clearly indicating that the disparate performance is not a question of biology but of the social definition of appearance. These findings could reshape our understanding of fairness in face biometrics and provide insights into FRS, helping to address gender bias issues.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2025.

Builds on

24 of 64 references.

References · 24

  1. 2015FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clusteringcited by 2,849
  2. 2017VGGFace2: A dataset for recognising faces across pose and agecited by 914
  3. 2016MS-Celeb-1M: A Dataset and Benchmark for Large-Scale Face Recognitioncited by 624
  4. 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 391
  5. 2020CurricularFace: Adaptive Curriculum Learning Loss for Deep Face Recognitioncited by 321
  6. 2021A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographicscited by 86
  7. 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
  8. 2020Fairness in Biometrics: a figure of merit to assess biometric verification systemscited by 41
  9. 2021PASS: Protected Attribute Suppression System for Mitigating Bias in Face Recognitioncited by 38
  10. 2020How Does Gender Balance In Training Data Affect Face Recognition Accuracy?cited by 37
  11. 2020MAAD-Face: A Massively Annotated Attribute Dataset for Face Imagescited by 32
  12. 2021Gendered Differences in Face Recognition Accuracy Explained by Hairstyles, Makeup, and Facial Morphologycited by 32
12 more
  1. 2020Post-Comparison Mitigation of Demographic Bias in Face Recognition Using Fair Score Normalizationcited by 28
  2. 2022Face Recognition Accuracy Across Demographics: Shining a Light Into the Problemcited by 25
  3. 2020Is Face Recognition Sexist? No, Gendered Hairstyles and Biology Arecited by 23
  4. 2020Beyond Identity: What Information Is Stored in Biometric Face Templates?cited by 23
  5. 2022Evaluating Proposed Fairness Models for Face Recognition Algorithmscited by 18
  6. 2018Stacked Dense U-Nets with Dual Transformers for Robust Face Alignmentcited by 17
  7. 2022The Gender Gap in Face Recognition Accuracy Is a Hairy Problemcited by 15
  8. 2023Logical Consistency and Greater Descriptive Power for Facial Hair Attribute Learningcited by 15
  9. 2023What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?cited by 13
  10. 2021Distill and De-bias: Mitigating Bias in Face Verification using Knowledge Distillationcited by 6
  11. 2023Beard Segmentation and Recognition Biascited by 5
  12. 2025On the Reliability of Biometric Datasets: How Much Test Data Ensures Reliability?cited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.