Testing the Performance of Face Recognition for People with Down Syndrome
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The fairness of biometric systems, in particular facial recognition, is often analysed for larger demographic groups, e.g. female vs. male or black vs. white. In contrast to this, minority groups are commonly ignored. This paper investigates the performance of facial recognition algorithms on individuals with Down syndrome, a common chromosomal abnormality that affects approximately one in 1,000 births per year. To do so, a database of 98 individuals with Down syndrome, each represented by at least five facial images, is semi-automatically collected from YouTube. Subsequently, two facial image quality assessment algorithms and five recognition algorithms are evaluated on the newly collected database and on the public facial image databases CelebA and FRGCv2. The results show that the quality scores of facial images for individuals with Down syndrome are comparable to those of individuals without Down syndrome captured under similar conditions. Furthermore, it is observed that face recognition performance decreases significantly for individuals with Down syndrome, which is largely attributed to the increased likelihood of false matches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 May 2024.
Builds on
7 of 22 references.
References · 7
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2022AdaFace: Quality Adaptive Margin for Face Recognitioncited by 390
- 2021MagFace: A Universal Representation for Face Recognition and Quality Assessmentcited by 332
- 2020Demographic Bias in Biometrics: A Survey on an Emerging Challengecited by 93
- 2019FaceQnet: Quality Assessment for Face Recognition based on Deep Learningcited by 61
- 2020Analysis of Gender Inequality In Face Recognition Accuracycited by 47
- 2021Demographic Fairness in Biometric Systems: What do the Experts say?cited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.